Optimization of primary aesthetic breast augmentation using implants: An evidence-based level approach

被引：3
作者：
Elfakir, H. [1 ]
Shipkov, H. [2 ]
Mojallal, A. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Ctr Hosp St Joseph St Luc, Serv Chirurg Plast & Brules, F-69395 Lyon 7, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Chirurg Plast Reconstructrice & Esthet, Hop Croix Rousse, F-69317 Lyon, France
来源：
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE | 2014年 / 59卷 / 02期
关键词：
Primary aesthetic breast augmentation; Silicone breast prostheses: Level of evidence in aesthetic breast augmentation; PREDICTABLE 24-HOUR RETURN; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; OF-THE-ART; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; POCKET IRRIGATION; OPTIMAL INCISION; MAMMAPLASTY; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I：
10.1016/j.anplas.2013.12.003
中图分类号：
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
The primary aesthetic breast augmentation has been the most performed cosmetic surgery procedure in the world for over 40 years. The current literature focuses on the new concept of "process of breast augmentation'' and the importance of non-surgical part (patient selection, preoperative planning and personalized management of postoperative care) in potentiating the cosmetic results and reducing the rate of complications and reoperations. This review of literature discusses, through an analysis of scientific evidence levels, every step of the whole process of breast augmentation in order to determine the current best practices tailored to each patient to optimize satisfactory and durable cosmetic outcomes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：89 / 96
页数：8
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [11] Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: Sensory changes, muscle function, and body image
    Banbury, J
    Yetman, R
    Lucas, A
    Papay, F
    Graves, K
    Zins, JE
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (02) : 701 - 707
  • [12] Managing Late Periprosthetic Fluid Collections (Seroma) in Patients with Breast Implants: A Consensus Panel Recommendation and Review of the Literature
    Bengtson, Bradley
    Brody, Garry S.
    Brown, Mitchell H.
    Glicksman, Caroline
    Hammond, Dennis
    Kaplan, Hilton
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    Oefelein, Michael G.
    Reisman, Neal R.
    Spear, Scott L.
    Jewell, Mark L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [13] Breast augmentation: Part III-epreoperative considerations and planning
    Berry, M. G.
    Cucchiara, V.
    Davies, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (11) : 1401 - 1409
  • [14] Sequestered fluid and breast implant malposition
    Brink, RR
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 98 (04) : 679 - 684
  • [15] Bronz Giorgio, 2002, Aesthet Surg J, V22, P238, DOI 10.1067/maj.2002.124759
  • [16] Patient Expectations After Breast Augmentation: The Imperative to Audit Your Sizing System
    Brown, Tim
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) : 1134 - 1139
  • [17] Subfascial Breast Augmentation: Is There Any Advantage Over the Submammary Plane?
    Brown, Tim
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 36 (03) : 566 - 569
  • [18] Round Gel Breast Implants or Anatomic Gel Breast Implants: Which is the Best Choice?
    Cardenas-Camarena, Lazaro
    Encinas-Brambila, Joel
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 33 (05) : 743 - 751
  • [19] Introducing Evidence-Based Medicine to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    Chung, Kevin C.
    Swanson, Jennifer A.
    Schmitz, DeLaine
    Sullivan, Daniel
    Rohrich, Rod J.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (04) : 1385 - 1389
  • [20] Cornette de Saint Cyr B, 2005, Ann Chir Plast Esthet, V50, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.anplas.2005.08.010
12345678