Cultural heritage as rural economic development: Batik production amongst China's Miao population

被引:33
作者
Chen, Zhengfu [1 ,3 ]
Ren, Xiaodong [2 ]
Zhang, Zaijie [3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Humanities & Law, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[2] Guizhou Normal Univ, Sch Karst Sci, State Engn Technol Inst Karst Desertificat Contro, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
[3] Green Dev Strategy High End Think Tank Guizhou, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
关键词
Cultural heritage; Batik production; Ethnic minority population; Rural economic development; Rooted networks; Development projects; China; TOURISM DEVELOPMENT; RETHINKING; NETWORKS; INDIGENEITY; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; VILLAGE; SPACE; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.024
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Cultural heritage has become a development resource for many rural areas in China driven by developmentalism and capitalism. This article takes handcrafts revival as a case study to demonstrate that how cultural heritage as rural economic development involves various power entanglements and interactions. In this process of development, we see how Miao people use their agency to enact different strategies to react to a multiplicity of circumstances. This research uses Rocheleau's rooted networks framework as a tool but expands the concept based on critical discussion and ambivalent experiences in Danzhai county, Guizhou Province, China. Collecting data from participatory observation, and a series of unstructured and semi-structured interviews in Danzhai, we explore the entangled web of network relations in the process of batik production, and examine how Miao artisans employ their agency to negotiate with different stakeholders and develop a regional batik market. Research demonstrates that making batik weaves Miao people's economic demand, social relations and cultural meaning to form a new social integration mechanism. This mechanism is networked by various relationships in Miao villages including production, distribution, exchange and cooperation. We find that the networks framework allows us to see how powers multiply, but could not explicitly explain some cases and concepts within local knowledge and social contexts. We find that it is necessary to modify Rocheleau's framework in order to incorporate non-western indigenous concepts in China.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 193
页数:12
相关论文
共 102 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Col
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Full Text of President Xi's Speech at Opening of Belt and Road Forum
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The Politics of World Heritage: Negotiating Tourism and Conservation
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GLOBAL NETW, DOI DOI 10.1111/1471-0374.00007
[6]  
Bank W., 1998, CULT SUST DEV FRAM A
[7]   The multifunctionality of mountain farming: Social constructions and local negotiations behind an apparent consensus [J].
Barnaud, Cecile ;
Couix, Nathalie .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2020, 73 :34-45
[8]  
Bendix Regina., 2008, Intangible Heritage, P253
[9]  
Blumenfield Tami., 2013, Cultural Heritage Politics in China
[10]  
Bramall Chris., 2008, Chinese Economic Development