Controlling ambiguity: The illusion of control in choice under risk and ambiguity

被引:5
作者
Berger, Alex [1 ]
Tymula, Agnieszka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Econ, A02, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Illusion of control; Ambiguity tolerance; PORTFOLIO CHOICE; PREFERENCES; ATTITUDES; AVERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11166-022-09399-4
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The illusion of control occurs when individuals believe that exerting objectively meaningless control over pure chance events increases their probability of success. In economics, the illusion of control has only ever been studied in choice under risk, where probability distributions are known, and has been found to have no effect. This contrasts with studies in psychology, which have found a persistent positive effect. The cause of these conflicting findings may be that the illusion of control only affects risk taking in choice under ambiguity, where probability distributions are fully or partially unknown. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted an incentive compatible laboratory experiment which induced the illusion of control in some participants. We find that the illusion of control does not affect choice under risk but increases ambiguity tolerance. These results bridge the gap between the psychology and economics literature, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing risk from ambiguity. Our results suggest that some studies may unintentionally induce an illusion of control and over-estimate ambiguity tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 284
页数:24
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Risk Preferences at Different Time Periods: An Experimental Investigation [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Diecidue, Enrico ;
Oencueler, Ayse .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (05) :975-987
[2]   Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment [J].
Ahn, David ;
Choi, Syngjoo ;
Gale, Douglas ;
Kariv, Shachar .
QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2014, 5 (02) :195-223
[3]   Ambiguity without a state space [J].
Ahn, David S. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2008, 75 (01) :3-28
[4]   Measuring ambiguity attitude: (Extended) multiplier preferences for the American and the Dutch population [J].
Baillon, Aurelien ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Huang, Zhenxing ;
van Loon, Rogier Potter .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2017, 54 (03) :269-281
[5]  
BURGER J M, 1982, Motivation and Emotion, V6, P329, DOI 10.1007/BF00998189
[6]   The uncertainty triangle - Uncovering heterogeneity in attitudes towards uncertainty [J].
Burghart, Daniel R. ;
Epper, Thomas ;
Fehr, Ernst .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2020, 60 (02) :125-156
[7]   Measuring ambiguity preferences: A new ambiguity preference survey module [J].
Cavatorta, Elisa ;
Schroder, David .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2019, 58 (01) :71-100
[8]   Ambiguity attitudes and social interactions: An experimental investigation [J].
Charness, Gary ;
Karni, Edi ;
Levin, Dan .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2013, 46 (01) :1-25
[9]   PORTFOLIO CHOICE AND RISK ATTITUDES: AN EXPERIMENT [J].
Charness, Gary ;
Gneezy, Uri .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2010, 48 (01) :133-146
[10]   Near-Misses and Stop Buttons in Slot Machine Play: An Investigation of How They Affect Players, and May Foster Erroneous Cognitions [J].
Dixon, Mike J. ;
Larche, Chanel J. ;
Stange, Madison ;
Graydon, Candice ;
Fugelsang, Jonathan A. .
JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2018, 34 (01) :161-180