Comparison of joint kinetics during free weight and flywheel resistance exercise

被引:5
作者
Chiu, Loren Z. F. [1 ]
Salem, George J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Musculoskeletal Biomech Res Lab, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
power; impulse; microgravity; exercise countermeasures;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The most common modality for resistance exercise is free weight resistance. Alternative methods of providing external resistance have been investigated, in particular for use in microgravity environments such as space flight. One alternative modality is flywheel inertial resistance, which generates resistance as a function of the mass, distribution of mass, and angular acceleration of the flywheel. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize net joint kinetics of multijoint exercises performed with a flywheel inertial resistance device in comparison to free weights. Eleven trained men and women performed the front squat, lunge, and push press on separate days with free weight or flywheel resistance, while instrumented for biomechanical analysis. Front squats performed with flywheel resistance required greater contribution of the hip and ankle, and less contribution of the knee, compared to free weight. Push presses performed with flywheel resistance had similar impulse requirements at the knee compared to free weight, but greater impulse requirement at the hip and ankle. As used in this investigation, flywheel inertial resistance increases the demand on the hip extensors and ankle plantarflexors and decreases the mechanical demand on the knee extensors for lower extremity exercises such as the front squat and lunge. Exercises involving dynamic lower and upper extremity actions, such as the push press, may benefit from flywheel inertial resistance, due to the increased mechanical demand on the knee extensors.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 562
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Effects of strength training, using a gravity-independent exercise system, performed during 110 days of simulated space station confinement
    Alkner, BA
    Berg, HE
    Kozlovskaya, I
    Sayenko, D
    Tesch, PA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 90 (1-2) : 44 - 49
  • [2] Bamman MM, 2000, J STRENGTH COND RES, V14, P45
  • [3] Force and power characteristics of a resistive exercise device for use in space
    Berg, HE
    Tesch, PA
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1998, 42 (1-8) : 219 - 230
  • [4] Burkhardt E, 1990, J APPL SPORTS SCI RE, V4, P107
  • [5] Evaluation Of Kinematic Signal Noise During Resistance Exercise Motion Analysis
    Chiu, Loren Z.
    Salem, George J.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 : S121 - S121
  • [6] Davis BL, 1996, AVIAT SPACE ENVIR MD, V67, P235
  • [7] EARLE RW, 2000, ESSENTIALS STRENGTH, P343
  • [8] Squatting exercises in older adults: Kinematic and kinetic comparisons
    Flanagan, S
    Salem, GJ
    Wang, MY
    Sanker, SE
    Greendale, GA
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2003, 35 (04) : 635 - 643
  • [9] FLANAGAN SP, J APPL BIOMECH, V21, P181
  • [10] Hamill J., 2004, RES METHODS BIOMECHA, P145