Effects of varying floor space on aggressive behavior and cortisol concentrations in group-housed sows

被引:17
作者
Hemsworth, P. H. [1 ]
Morrison, R. S. [2 ]
Tilbrook, A. J. [3 ]
Butler, K. L. [1 ,4 ]
Rice, M. [1 ]
Moeller, S. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Rivalea Australia, Corowa, NSW 2646, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, South Australia Res & Dev Inst, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia
[4] Dept Econ Dev Jobs Transport & Resources, Biometr Grp, Hamilton, Vic 3030, Australia
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
behavior; group housing; reproduction; sows; space; welfare; ANIMAL-WELFARE; FEMALE PIGS; SOCIAL RANK; ALLOWANCE; STRESS; STALLS; SIZE; DRY;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2016-0583
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Floor space is an important determinant of aggression and stress in group-housed sows, and the aim of the present experiment was to comprehensively examine the effects of floor space in the range of 1.45 to 2.90 m(2)/sow from mixing until 27 d after insemination on aggression, stress, and reproduction of group-housed sows. A previous experiment on the effects of floor space indicated spatial variability across and along the research facility in both sow aggression and stress. To minimize this spatial variability within the research facility, similar-sized pens but with varying groups sizes (10-20) in 4 separate blocks of 3 contiguous pens within each of 9 time replicates (180 sows/replicate) were used to examine 6 space allowances (1.45-2.9 m(2)/sow). Space treatments were appropriately randomized to pens. Although it may be argued that space allowance is confounded with group size in this design, there was no evidence in our previous experiment of group size effects, for pens of 10 to 80 sows, or appreciable interactions between space and group size on aggression, stress, and reproduction. In the present experiment, sows were introduced to treatments within 4 d of insemination and were floor fed 4 times per day (2.5 kg/sow per d). On both Days 2 and 26 after mixing, aggressive behavior (bites and knocks) at feeding and plasma cortisol concentrations were measured. Restricted maximum likelihood mixed model analyses were used to examine the treatment effect after accounting for replicate and random spatial location effects within replicate. There was a consistent linear effect of floor space allowance on aggression at feeding at Day 2 (P < 0.0001) and plasma cortisol concentrations at Day 2 (P = 0.0003), with aggression and stress declining with increasing space. However, there were no effects of space allowance on aggression and stress at Day 26 (P = 0.14 and P = 0.79, respectively). These results show that increased floor space in the immediate post-mixing period reduces aggression and stress and that sows may adapt to reduced floor space over time. A strategy of staged-gestation penning, with more space immediately after mixing and less space later in gestation, may address both animal welfare and economic considerations, but this clearly requires further examination.
引用
收藏
页码:4809 / 4818
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production
    Arey, DS
    Edwards, SA
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1998, 56 (01): : 61 - 70
  • [2] THE EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP PENNING OF PIGS ON TOTAL AND FREE PLASMA CORTICOSTEROIDS AND THE MAXIMUM CORTICOSTEROID BINDING-CAPACITY
    BARNETT, JL
    CRONIN, GM
    WINFIELD, CG
    [J]. GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1981, 44 (02) : 219 - 225
  • [3] A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing
    Barnett, JL
    Hemsworth, PH
    Cronin, GM
    Jongman, EC
    Hutson, GD
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (01): : 1 - 28
  • [4] EFFECTS OF PEN SIZE, PARTIAL STALLS AND METHOD OF FEEDING ON WELFARE-RELATED BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES OF GROUP-HOUSED PIGS
    BARNETT, JL
    HEMSWORTH, PH
    CRONIN, GM
    NEWMAN, EA
    MCCALLUM, TH
    CHILTON, D
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1992, 34 (03) : 207 - 220
  • [5] Barnett JL, 1997, LIVESTOCK ENVIRONMENT V, VOLS I AND II, P613
  • [6] Group gestation housing with individual feeding-I: How feeding regime, resource allocation, and genetic factors affect sow welfare
    Bench, C. J.
    Rioja-Lang, F. C.
    Hayne, S. M.
    Gonyou, H. W.
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2013, 152 (2-3) : 208 - 217
  • [7] Broom DM., 1993, STRESS ANIMAL WELFAR, DOI [10.1007/978-94-024-0980-2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0980-2]
  • [8] SOCIAL RANK AND FEEDING-BEHAVIOR OF GROUP-HOUSED SOWS FED COMPETITIVELY OR AD-LIBITUM
    BROUNS, F
    EDWARDS, SA
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1994, 39 (3-4) : 225 - 235
  • [9] AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR IN GROUPED SOWS .2. HOW SOCIAL RANK AFFECTS FEEDING AND DRINKING BEHAVIOR
    CSERMELY, D
    WOODGUSH, DGM
    [J]. BOLLETTINO DI ZOOLOGIA, 1990, 57 (01): : 55 - 58
  • [10] Edwards S.A., 1986, P INT S APPL ETH FAR, P69