The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component

被引:35
作者
Antonakakis, Marios [1 ]
Schrader, Sophie [1 ]
Wollbrink, Ndreas [1 ]
Oostenveld, Robert [2 ,3 ]
Rampp, Stefan [4 ]
Haueisen, Jens [5 ]
Wolters, Carsten H. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Inst Biomagnetism & Biosignalanal, Anbau HNO Klin EG Raum 5,Malmedyweg 15, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Dept Neurosurg, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Ilmenau, Inst Biomed Engn & Informat, Ilmenau, Germany
[6] Univ Munster, Otto Creutzfeldt Ctr Cognit & Behav Neurosci, Munster, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
EEG; finite element method; MEG; multimodal imaging; somatosensory cortex; somatosensory evoked fields; somatosensory evoked potentials; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; MEDIAN NERVE; ELECTRICAL-CONDUCTIVITY; TISSUE CONDUCTIVITY; CEREBRAL-CORTEX; INVERSE PROBLEM; LOCALIZATION; SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.24754
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Modeling and experimental parameters influence the Electro- (EEG) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) source analysis of the somatosensory P20/N20 component. In a sensitivity group study, we compare P20/N20 source analysis due to different stimulation type (Electric-Wrist [EW], Braille-Tactile [BT], or Pneumato-Tactile [PT]), measurement modality (combined EEG/MEG - EMEG, EEG, or MEG) and head model (standard or individually skull-conductivity calibrated including brain anisotropic conductivity). Considerable differences between pairs of stimulation types occurred (EW-BT: 8.7 +/- 3.3 mm/27.1 degrees +/- 16.4 degrees, BT-PT: 9 +/- 5 mm/29.9 degrees +/- 17.3 degrees, and EW-PT: 9.8 +/- 7.4 mm/15.9 degrees +/- 16.5 degrees and 75% strength reduction of BT or PT when compared to EW) regardless of the head model used. EMEG has nearly no localization differences to MEG, but large ones to EEG (16.1 +/- 4.9 mm), while source orientation differences are non-negligible to both EEG (14 degrees +/- 3.7 degrees) and MEG (12.5 degrees +/- 10.9 degrees). Our calibration results show a considerable inter-subject variability (3.1-14 mS/m) for skull conductivity. The comparison due to different head model show localization differences smaller for EMEG (EW: 3.4 +/- 2.4 mm, BT: 3.7 +/- 3.4 mm, and PT: 5.9 +/- 6.8 mm) than for EEG (EW: 8.6 +/- 8.3 mm, BT: 11.8 +/- 6.2 mm, and PT: 10.5 +/- 5.3 mm), while source orientation differences for EMEG (EW: 15.4 degrees +/- 6.3 degrees, BT: 25.7 degrees +/- 15.2 degrees and PT: 14 degrees +/- 11.5 degrees) and EEG (EW: 14.6 degrees +/- 9.5 degrees, BT: 16.3 degrees +/- 11.1 degrees and PT: 12.9 degrees +/- 8.9 degrees) are in the same range. Our results show that stimulation type, modality and head modeling all have a non-negligible influence on the source reconstruction of the P20/N20 component. The complementary information of both modalities in EMEG can be exploited on the basis of detailed and individualized head models.
引用
收藏
页码:5011 / 5028
页数:18
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation [J].
Acar, Zeynep Akalin ;
Acar, Can E. ;
Makeig, Scott .
NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 124 :168-180
[2]   Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization [J].
Acar, Zeynep Akalin ;
Makeig, Scott .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2013, 26 (03) :378-396
[3]   Conductivities of three-layer live human skull [J].
Akhtari, M ;
Bryant, HC ;
Marnelak, AN ;
Flynn, ER ;
Heller, L ;
Shih, JJ ;
Mandelkern, M ;
Matlachov, A ;
Ranken, DM ;
Best, ED ;
DiMauro, MA ;
Lee, RR ;
Sutherling, WW .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2002, 14 (03) :151-167
[4]   POTENTIALS-EVOKED IN HUMAN AND MONKEY CEREBRAL-CORTEX BY STIMULATION OF THE MEDIAN NERVE - A REVIEW OF SCALP AND INTRACRANIAL RECORDINGS [J].
ALLISON, T ;
MCCARTHY, G ;
WOOD, CC ;
JONES, SJ .
BRAIN, 1991, 114 :2465-2503
[5]  
ANTONAKAKIS M, 2019, 41 INT ENG MED BIOL
[6]  
ARUMUGAM EME, 2018, IMPACT INDIVIDUAL CO
[7]   Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study [J].
Aydin, Ue. ;
Rampp, S. ;
Wollbrink, A. ;
Kugel, H. ;
Cho, J. -H. ;
Knoesche, T. R. ;
Grova, C. ;
Wellmer, J. ;
Wolters, C. H. .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2017, 30 (04) :417-433
[8]   Combined EEG/MEG Can Outperform Single Modality EEG or MEG Source Reconstruction in Presurgical Epilepsy Diagnosis [J].
Aydin, Uemit ;
Vorwerk, Johannes ;
Duempelmann, Matthias ;
Kuepper, Philipp ;
Kugel, Harald ;
Heers, Marcel ;
Wellmer, Joerg ;
Kellinghaus, Christoph ;
Haueisen, Jens ;
Rampp, Stefan ;
Stefan, Hermann ;
Wolters, Carsten H. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03)
[9]   Combining EEG and MEG for the Reconstruction of Epileptic Activity Using a Calibrated Realistic Volume Conductor Model [J].
Aydin, Uemit ;
Vorwerk, Johannes ;
Kuepper, Philipp ;
Heers, Marcel ;
Kugel, Harald ;
Galka, Andreas ;
Hamid, Laith ;
Wellmer, Joerg ;
Kellinghaus, Christoph ;
Rampp, Stefan ;
Wolters, Carsten Hermann .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03)
[10]   EEG IN NEONATES: FORWARD MODELING AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS WITH RESPECT TO VARIATIONS OF THE CONDUCTIVITY [J].
Azizollahi, Hamed ;
Darbas, Marion ;
Diallo, Mohamadou M. ;
El Badia, Abdellatif ;
Lohrengel, Stephanie .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (04) :905-932