Confidence intervals for the difference in the success rates of two treatments in the analysis of correlated binary responses

被引:2
作者
Saha, Krishna K. [1 ]
Wang, Suojin [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Connecticut State Univ, Dept Math Sci, 1615 Stanley St, New Britain, CT 06050 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Stat, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
confidence interval; correlated data; coverage probability; expected width; success rates; PROPORTIONS; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.201700089
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In clinical studies, we often compare the success rates of two treatment groups where post-treatment responses of subjects within clusters are usually correlated. To estimate the difference between the success rates, interval estimation procedures that do not account for this intraclass correlation are likely inappropriate. To address this issue, we propose three interval procedures by direct extensions of recently proposed methods for independent binary data based on the concepts of design effect and effective sample size used in sample surveys. Each of them is then evaluated with four competing variance estimates. We also extend three existing methods recommended for complex survey data using different weighting schemes required for those three existing methods. An extensive simulation study is conducted for the purposes of evaluating and comparing the performance of the proposed methods in terms of coverage and expected width. The interval estimation procedures are illustrated using three examples in clinical and social science studies. Our analytic arguments and numerical studies suggest that the methods proposed in this work may be useful in clustered data analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 1002
页数:20
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BRIER SS, 1980, BIOMETRIKA, V67, P591
[2]   A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING MELPHALAN PREDNISONE WITH OR WITHOUT INTERFERON ALFA-2B IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-MYELOMA - A CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP-B STUDY [J].
COOPER, MR ;
DEAR, K ;
MCINTYRE, OR ;
OZER, H ;
ELLERTON, J ;
CANELLOS, G ;
BERNHARDT, B ;
DUGGAN, D ;
FARAGHER, D ;
SCHIFFER, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (01) :155-160
[3]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL CONSTRUCTION FOR EFFECT MEASURES ARISING FROM CLUSTER RANDOMIZATION TRIALS [J].
DONNER, A ;
KLAR, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (02) :123-131
[4]   On adapting test function methods for fast detection of fold bifurcations in power systems [J].
Hussein, A ;
Chen, K ;
Wan, HB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, 2002, 12 (01) :179-185
[5]  
Jung SH, 2000, DRUG INF J, V34, P599, DOI 10.1177/009286150003400228
[6]  
Kish L., 1965, Survey sampling
[7]  
Korn EL., 1998, SURV METHODOL, V23, P193
[8]   Approximate and Fiducial Confidence Intervals for the Difference Between Two Binomial Proportions [J].
Krishnamoorthy, K. ;
Zhang, Dan .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2015, 44 (08) :1745-1759
[9]   THE IMPACT OF LITTER EFFECTS ON DOSE-RESPONSE MODELING IN TERATOLOGY [J].
KUPPER, LL ;
PORTIER, C ;
HOGAN, MD ;
YAMAMOTO, E .
BIOMETRICS, 1986, 42 (01) :85-98
[10]   ESTIMATION AND SAMPLE-SIZE CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLUSTERED BINARY RESPONSES [J].
LEE, EW ;
DUBIN, N .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (12) :1241-1252