Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework

被引:375
作者
Shippee, Nathan D. [1 ]
Garces, Juan Pablo Domecq [2 ,3 ]
Lopez, Gabriela J. Prutsky [2 ,4 ]
Wang, Zhen [5 ]
Elraiyah, Tarig A. [2 ]
Nabhan, Mohammed [2 ,6 ]
Brito, Juan P. [7 ]
Boehmer, Kasey [5 ]
Hasan, Rim [2 ]
Firwana, Belal [2 ]
Erwin, Patricia J. [8 ]
Montori, Victor M. [9 ,10 ]
Murad, M. Hassan [9 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Knowledge Synth Program, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Henry Ford Hosp, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Childrens Hosp Michigan,Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN USA
[6] St Joseph Mercy Hosp, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Div Endocrinol, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Mayo Clin Libraries, Rochester, MN USA
[9] Mayo Clin, Med, Rochester, MN USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Healthcare Delivery Res Program, Ctr Sci Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Mayo Clin, Knowledge Synth Program, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
patient and public involvement; patient engagement; systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; HEALTH RESEARCH; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT; GENERAL-PRACTICE; OLDER-PEOPLE; COMMUNITY; PARTICIPATION; CANCER; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1111/hex.12090
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There is growing attention towards increasing patient and service user engagement (PSUE) in biomedical and health services research. Existing variations in language and design inhibit reporting and indexing, which are crucial to comparative effectiveness in determining best practices. Objective This paper utilizes a systematic review and environmental scan to derive an evidence-based framework for PSUE. Design A metanarrative systematic review and environmental scan/manual search using scientific databases and other search engines, along with feedback from a patient advisory group (PAG). Eligible sources English-language studies, commentaries, grey literature and other sources (including systematic and non-systematic reviews) pertaining to patient and public involvement in biomedical and health services research. Data extracted Study description (e.g. participant demographics, research setting) and design, if applicable; frameworks, conceptualizations or planning schemes for PSUE-related endeavours; and methods for PSUE initiation and gathering patients'/service users' input or contributions. Results Overall, 202 sources were included and met eligibility criteria; 41 of these presented some framework or conceptualization of PSUE. Sources were synthesized into a two-part framework for PSUE: (i) integral PSUE components include patient and service user initiation, reciprocal relationships, colearning and re-assessment and feedback, (ii) sources describe PSUE at several research stages, within three larger phases: preparatory, execution and translational. Discussion and Conclusions Efforts at developing a solid evidence base on PSUE are limited by the non-standard and non-empirical nature of much of the literature. Our proposed two-part framework provides a standard structure and language for reporting and indexing to support comparative effectiveness and optimize PSUE.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1166
页数:16
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas [J].
Abma, Tineke A. ;
Broerse, Jacqueline E. W. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2010, 13 (02) :160-173
[2]   Patients as Partners in Responsive Research: Methodological Notions for Collaborations in Mixed Research Teams [J].
Abma, Tineke A. ;
Nierse, Christi J. ;
Widdershoven, Guy A. M. .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (03) :401-415
[3]   Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer Review [J].
Ahmed, Syed M. ;
Palermo, Ann-Gel S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (08) :1380-1387
[4]   What patients want - Consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke [J].
Ali, K ;
Roffe, C ;
Crome, P .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (03) :865-871
[5]   Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals [J].
Andejeski, Y ;
Bisceglio, IT ;
Dickersin, K ;
Johnson, JE ;
Robinson, SI ;
Smith, HS ;
Visco, FM ;
Rich, IM .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (04) :379-388
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, User-controlled research: Its meanings and Final Report
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The PIRICOM study: A systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research
[8]   Frail bodies, courageous voices: older people influencing community care [J].
Barnes, M ;
Bennett, G .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 1998, 6 (02) :102-111
[9]  
Becker A., 2005, Methods in community-Based Participatory research for Health: Strategies and techniques for effective group process in CBPR partnerships
[10]   Understanding consumer participation in mental health: Issues of power and change [J].
Bennetts, Wanda ;
Cross, Wendy ;
Bloomer, Melissa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2011, 20 (03) :155-164