Impact of abundance data errors on the uncertainty of an ecological water quality assessment index

被引:15
作者
Gobeyn, Sacha [1 ]
Bennetsen, Elina [1 ]
Van Echelpoel, Wout [1 ]
Everaert, Gert [1 ]
Goethals, Peter L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Lab Environm Toxicol & Aquat Ecol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Ecological water quality assessment; Uncertainty analysis; Abundance data; Macroinvertebrates; Virtual experiments; River management; MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLES; MULTIMETRIC INDEXES; RIVER MANAGEMENT; STAR PROJECT; STREAMS; BIOASSESSMENT; FRAMEWORK; BELGIUM; CONCLUSIONS; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.031
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Increased awareness about the uncertainty of ecological water quality (EWQ) assessment tools in river management has led to the identification of the underlying uncertainty sources and the quantification of their effect on assessment. More specifically, with respect to macroinvertebrate-based EWQ assessment, use of erroneous abundance data has been identified as a (possible) source of uncertainty. In this paper, the effect of erroneous abundance data on the uncertainty of an EWQ assessment index was investigated. A model simulation based method, the virtual ecologist approach, was used to estimate the impact of abundance data errors on the uncertainty of the Multimetric Macroinvertebrate Index Flanders (MMIF). The results of this study show that the effects of relative small errors on the MMIF and assessment are limited. Additionally, it is observed that uncertainties due to abundance errors increase with decreasing EWQ (i.e. lower MMIF). This is important, since decision-makers typically formulate management actions for rivers with a low EWQ In short, the innovative virtual ecologist approach proved to be very successful to research the index uncertainty and present a unique insight in the functioning of the assessment index. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 753
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Barbour M.T., 2003, Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish, VSecond
[2]   Modelling habitat preference, abundance and species richness of alien macrocrustaceans in surface waters in Flanders (Belgium) using decision trees [J].
Boets, Pieter ;
Lock, Koen ;
Goethals, Peter L. M. .
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2013, 17 :73-81
[3]  
Bradshaw G.A., 2000, ECOL SOC, V4, P1
[4]   Intercalibration and comparison - major results and conclusions from the STAR project [J].
Buffagni, Andrea ;
Furse, Mike .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2006, 566 (1) :357-364
[5]  
Central Plains Center for BioAssessment K.B.S., 2009, TECHNICAL REPORT
[6]   Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management [J].
Clark, MJ .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2002, 12 (04) :347-363
[7]   Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics [J].
Clarke, Ralph T. ;
Lorenz, Armin ;
Sandin, Leonard ;
Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid ;
Strackbein, Joerg ;
Kneebone, Nick T. ;
Haase, Peter .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2006, 566 (1) :441-459
[8]   Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods - major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS [J].
Clarke, Ralph T. ;
Hering, Daniel .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2006, 566 (1) :433-439
[9]   Sampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices [J].
Clarke, RT ;
Furse, MT ;
Gunn, RJM ;
Winder, JM ;
Wright, JF .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (09) :1735-1751
[10]  
De Pauw N., 1991, MACROINVERTEBRATEN W