Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study

被引:35
作者
Choi, JiSun [1 ]
Boyle, Diane K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Nursing Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Wyoming, Fay W Whitney Sch Nursing, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
Acute care units; NDNQI; Unit nursing practice environment; Registered nurse; WORK ENVIRONMENTS; JOB-SATISFACTION; MAGNET HOSPITALS; CLINICAL NURSES; PATIENT; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; LEVEL; SUBUNITS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The hospital nursing practice environment has been found to be crucial for better nurse and patient outcomes. Yet little is known about the professional nursing practice environment at the unit level where nurses provide 24-hour bedside care to patients. Objectives: To examine differences in nursing practice environments among 11 unit types (critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, combined medical-surgical, obstetric, neonatal, pediatric, psychiatric, perioperative, and emergency) and by Magnet status overall, as well as four specific aspects of the practice environment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Settings: 5322 nursing units in 519 US acute care hospitals. Methods: The nursing practice environment was measured by the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index mean composite and four subscale scores were computed at the unit level. Two statistical approaches (one-way analysis of covariance and multivariate analysis of covariance analysis) were employed with a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Results: In general, the nursing practice environment was favorable in all unit types. There were significant differences in the nursing practice environment among the 11 unit types and by Magnet status. Pediatric units had the most favorable practice environment and medical-surgical units had the least favorable. A consistent finding across all unit types except neonatal units was that the staffing and resource adequacy subscale scored the lowest compared with all other Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index subscales (nursing foundations for quality of care, nurse manager ability, leadership, and support, and nurse-physician relations). Unit nursing practice environments were more favorable in Magnet than non-Magnet hospitals. Conclusions: Findings indicate that there are significant variations in unit nursing practice environments among 11 unit types and by hospital Magnet status. Both hospital-level and unit-specific strategies should be considered to achieve an excellent nursing practice environment in all hospital units. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1441 / 1449
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Clinical specialty and organizational features of acute hospital wards [J].
Adams, A ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1997, 26 (06) :1158-1167
[2]   Effects of hospital care environment on patient mortality and nurse outcomes [J].
Aiken, Linda H. ;
Clarke, Sean P. ;
Sloane, Douglas M. .
JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 38 (05) :223-229
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, KEEPING PATIENTS SAF
[4]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P3, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[5]   Unit type differences in RN workgroup job satisfaction [J].
Boyle, Diane K. ;
Miller, Peggy A. ;
Gajewski, Byron J. ;
Hart, Sara E. ;
Dunton, Nancy .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2006, 28 (06) :622-640
[6]   Clinical Microsystems: The Building Blocks of Patient Safety [J].
Disch, Joanne .
CREATIVE NURSING, 2006, 12 (03) :13-14
[7]   The Business Case for Magnet® [J].
Drenkard, Karen .
JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 40 (06) :263-271
[8]   Nursing unit managers, staff retention and the work environment [J].
Duffield, Christine M. ;
Roche, Michael A. ;
Blay, Nicole ;
Stasa, Helen .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (1-2) :23-33
[9]   Assessing and Redesigning the Nursing Practice Environment [J].
Eaton-Spiva, LeeAnna ;
Buitrago, Paola ;
Trotter, Lisa ;
Macy, Amy ;
Lariscy, Mary ;
Johnson, Donna .
JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 40 (01) :36-42