Perspectives on solar geoengineering from Finnish Lapland: Local insights on the global imaginary of Arctic geoengineering

被引:17
作者
Buck, Holly Jean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Dev Sociol, 240 Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
Climate engineering; Solar geoengineering; Anthropocene; Stratospheric aerosol injection; Governance; Hope; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; PERCEPTIONS; GOVERNANCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.020
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
"Solar geoengineering" or albedo modification-changing the reflectivity of the earth, using methods like placing particles in the stratosphere-has been proposed as a means to potentially cool the Arctic and forestall climate tipping points. However, this concept has remained a global imaginary, grounded in coarse-resolution climate modeling. How do people actually living in the Arctic imagine themselves experiencing or shaping solar geoengineering? How can the experience of people in particular places inform discussions of solar geoengineering governance? This paper synthesizes perspectives from extended interviews with citizen stakeholders in Finnish Lapland. Rather than approaching solar geoengineering from the perspective of Arctic or local interests, respondents took a global view of its prospects and governance. However, the idea of solar geoengineering also sparked deeper discussions about northern or Arctic ways of living in the Anthropocene: how to coexist with loss and unfamiliar climates, relocalization and new rural livelihoods in the north, and dematerialization of northern economies. The results challenge some common tacit assumptions in geoengineering governance discourse: (1) that people's climate preferences are obvious or quantifiable; (2) that individuals will look at solar geoengineering through an personal, utilitarian lens, or as a game of maximizing benefits to their region, when in fact they may have a cosmopolitan or interconnected systems-perspective; and (3) that states act in the interests of their citizens, when in fact they may act in the interests of elites.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 86
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth, Committee on Geoengineering Climate: Technical Evaluation and Discussion of Impacts, P1, DOI [DOI 10.17226/18988, 10.17226/18988]
  • [3] Ambivalent climate of opinions: Tensions and dilemmas in understanding geoengineering experimentation
    Asayama, Shinichiro
    Sugiyama, Masahiro
    Ishii, Atsushi
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2017, 80 : 82 - 92
  • [4] A science of loss
    Barnett, Jon
    Tschakert, Petra
    Head, Lesley
    Adger, W. Neil
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (11) : 976 - 978
  • [6] Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society?
    Beck, Ulrich
    [J]. CURRENT SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 63 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [7] Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: An experimental deliberative approach
    Bellamy, Rob
    Lezaun, Javier
    Palmer, James
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 45 : 194 - 202
  • [8] Crafting a public for geoengineering
    Bellamy, Rob
    Lezaun, Javier
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2017, 26 (04) : 402 - 417
  • [9] Down to Earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene
    Biermann, Frank
    Bai, Xuemei
    Bondre, Ninad
    Broadgate, Wendy
    Chen, Chen-Tung Arthur
    Dube, Opha Pauline
    Erisman, Jan Willem
    Erisman, Jan Willem
    van der Hel, Sandra
    Lemos, Maria Carmen
    Seitzinger, Sybil
    Seto, Karen C.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 39 : 341 - 350
  • [10] The who, what, and wherefore of geoengineering governance
    Bodansky, Daniel
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 121 (03) : 539 - 551