Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: Feasibility of a novel technique

被引:43
作者
Caoili, EM
Paulson, EK
Heyneman, LE
Branch, MS
Eubanks, WS
Nelson, RC
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740487
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the feasibility and image quality of a new noninvasive biliary imaging technique: helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen subjects including five healthy volunteers and 14 patients underwent helical CT cholangiography. Subjects ingested 6.0 g of iopanoic acid 6-10 hr before undergoing imaging. Axial data were used to construct three-dimensional volume-rendered cholangiograms. Two radiologists, an endoscopist, and a laparoscopic surgeon reviewed the images and evaluated overall image quality. In the 14 patients, findings from CT cholangiography were compared with those from ERCP, surgery, and intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS. All segments of the biliary tree were opacified in all volunteers except one, in whom the intrahepatic ducts were not opacified. Image quality was good to excellent in all volunteers. Anomalous cystic duct insertions were seen in two volunteers. Opacification of the biliary tree was rated as acceptable to excellent in nine patients and suboptimal in five. In five patients with good or excellent opacification, the biliary anatomy correlated with findings on intraoperative cholangiography or ERCP. CT cholangiography revealed additional conditions (gallbladder varices and acute pancreatitis) and variant anatomy in three patients. CONCLUSION. Results of this pilot project suggest that obtaining CT cholangiograms using an oral biliary contrast agent is a feasible, noninvasive method for revealing biliary anatomy. However, visualization of the biliary tree was suboptimal in 36% of the patients, which represents a limitation of this technique.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 492
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] MR-CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY - EFFICACY OF 3-DIMENSIONAL TURBO SPIN-ECHO TECHNIQUE
    BARISH, MA
    YUCEL, EK
    SOTO, JA
    CHUTTANI, R
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (02) : 295 - 300
  • [2] Pancreas divisum: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography
    Bret, PM
    Reinhold, C
    Taourel, P
    Guibaud, L
    Atri, M
    Barkun, AN
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [3] CHOLEDOCHAL CYST - IMAGING BY TELEPAQUE-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    CARTAGENA, AM
    LEVIN, TL
    WEINBERG, G
    GOLDMAN, HS
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 1993, 17 (04) : 263 - 265
  • [4] CARY DA, 1990, PEDIATR RADIOL, V21, P73
  • [5] Choledocholithiasis: Comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
    Chan, YL
    Chan, ACW
    Lam, WWM
    Lee, DWH
    Chung, SSC
    Sung, JJY
    Cheung, HS
    Li, AKC
    Metreweli, C
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [6] Cheng YF, 1997, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V11, P209
  • [7] COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A NATIONAL SURVEY OF 4,292 HOSPITALS AND AN ANALYSIS OF 77,604 CASES
    DEZIEL, DJ
    MILLIKAN, KW
    ECONOMOU, SG
    DOOLAS, A
    KO, ST
    AIRAN, MC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [8] FERGUSON CM, 1992, ANN SURG, V215, P196
  • [9] Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
    Fleischmann, D
    Ringl, H
    Schofl, R
    Potzi, R
    Kontrus, M
    Henk, C
    Bankier, AA
    Kettenbach, J
    Mostbeck, GH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (03) : 861 - 868
  • [10] 3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY CHOLANGIOGRAPHY - A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR BILIARY-TRACT IMAGING
    GILLAMS, A
    GARDENER, J
    RICHARDS, R
    TAN, AC
    LINNEY, A
    LEES, WR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (797) : 445 - 448