Modified non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III with fine final level selection

被引:16
作者
Gu, Qinghua [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Rui [1 ]
Xie, Haiyan [3 ]
Li, Xuexian [1 ]
Jiang, Song [2 ]
Xiong, Naixue [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Management, 13 Middle Yanta Rd, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Resource Engn, 13 Middle Yanta Rd, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[3] Illinois State Univ, Coll Appl Sci & Technol, Dept Technol, Normal, IL 61761 USA
[4] Northeastern State Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Tahlequah, OK USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Many-objective optimization; Convergence; NSGA-III; Environmental selection; IMPROVED NSGA-III; OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; BALANCING CONVERGENCE; INDICATOR; DIVERSITY; DESIGN; OPERATOR;
D O I
10.1007/s10489-020-02053-z
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Dominance resistance is a challenge for Pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve the high-dimensional optimization problems. The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III) still has such disadvantage even though it is recognized as an algorithm with good performance for many-objective problems. Thus, a variation of NSGA-III algorithm based on fine final level selection is proposed to improve convergence. The fine final level selection is designed in this way. The theta-dominance relation is used to sort the solutions in the critical layer firstly. Then I-SDE index and favor convergence are employed to evaluate convergence of individuals for different situations. And some better solutions are selected finally. The effectiveness of our proposed algorithm is validated by comparing with nine state-of-the-art algorithms on the Deb-Thiele-Laumanns-Zitzler and Walking-Fish-Group test suits. And the optimization objectives are varying from 3 to 15. The performance is evaluated by the inverted generational distance (IGD), hypervolume (HV), generational distance (GD). The simulation results show that the proposed algorithm has an average improvement of 55.4%, 60.0%, 63.1% of 65 test instances for IGD, HV, GD indexes over the original NSGA-III algorithm. Besides, the proposed algorithm obtains the best performance by comparing 9 state-of-art algorithms in HV, GD indexes and ranks third for IGD indicator. Therefore, the proposed algorithm can achieve the advantages over the benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页码:4236 / 4269
页数:34
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NAT COMMUN, DOI DOI 10.1109/TEVC.2016.2611642
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MULTIOBJECTIVE EVOLU
[3]   A Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many Objective Optimization [J].
Asafuddoula, M. ;
Ray, Tapabrata ;
Sarker, Ruhul .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (03) :445-460
[4]   A new dominance-relation metric balancing convergence and diversity in multi- and many-objective optimization [J].
Bao, Chunteng ;
Xu, Lihong ;
Goodman, Erik D. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 134 :14-27
[5]   SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume [J].
Beume, Nicola ;
Naujoks, Boris ;
Emmerich, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) :1653-1669
[6]   A niche-elimination operation based NSGA-III algorithm for many-objective optimization [J].
Bi, Xiaojun ;
Wang, Chao .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (01) :118-141
[7]   An improved NSGA-III algorithm based on elimination operator for many-objective optimization [J].
Bi, Xiaojun ;
Wang, Chao .
MEMETIC COMPUTING, 2017, 9 (04) :361-383
[8]   A clustering-ranking method for many-objective optimization [J].
Cai, Lei ;
Qu, Shiru ;
Yuan, Yuan ;
Yao, Xin .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 35 :681-694
[9]   A diversity indicator based on reference vectors for many-objective optimization [J].
Cai, Xinye ;
Sun, Haoran ;
Fan, Zhun .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 430 :467-486
[10]  
Chen H, 2019, IEEE T CYBERNETICS H