Ertapenem monotherapy versus combination therapy with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults

被引:52
作者
Yellin, AE
Hassett, JM
Fernandez, A
Geib, J
Adeyi, B
Woods, GL
Teppler, H
机构
[1] USC, Med Ctr, LAC, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Millard Fillmore Hosp, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] Hosp Roosevelt, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[4] Merck Res Labs, W Point, PA USA
关键词
ertapenem; intra-abdominal infection; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1016/S0924-8579(02)00160-7
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) ertapenem, 1 and 1.5 g once a day, for treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection were compared with those of IV ceftriaxone 2 g once a day plus IV metronidazole 500 mg every 8 h. After at least 3 days of IV therapy and satisfactory clinical response, patients could be switched to oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole. Fifty-nine patients were randomized to receive ertapenem 1 g and 51 to receive ertapenem 1.5 g; 55 patients were randomized to each comparator group. At the test of cure, 4-6 weeks post therapy, in the 1 g cohort, 84% (26/31) of patients treated with ertapenem and 85% (35/41) with comparator therapy had a favourable clinical and microbiological assessment. Success rates in the 1.5 g cohort were 83% (22/29) and 77% (24/31) in the ertapenem and comparator groups, respectively. Drug-related adverse events were generally similar in both treatment groups. Ertapenent 1 or 1.5 g once a day followed by optional oral therapy appeared similar to combined therapy with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole with the same optional oral switch for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults. Although not compared directly in a randomized fashion, the efficacy and safety profiles of ertapenem 1 and 1.5 g appeared comparable. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated and had an overall safety profile similar to ceftriaxone plus metronidazole. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 173
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
APPLEMAN MD, 1998, 38 INT C ANT AG CHEM, P244
[2]  
Barie P S, 2000, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V1, P91, DOI 10.1089/109629600321128
[3]   Management of complicated intra-abdominal infections [J].
Barie, PS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 11 (06) :464-477
[4]  
Barie PS, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P1294
[5]  
BOHNEN JMA, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P83
[6]  
Christou NV, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P1193
[7]   Antimicrobial treatment of intra-abdominal infections [J].
Elsakr, R ;
Johnson, DA ;
Younes, Z ;
Oldfield, EC .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 1998, 16 (01) :47-60
[8]   In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against clinical bacterial isolates from 11 North American medical centers [J].
Fuchs, PC ;
Barry, AL ;
Brown, SD .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 45 (06) :1915-1918
[9]   Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against 1,001 anaerobes isolated from human intra-abdominal infections [J].
Goldstein, EJC ;
Citron, DM ;
Merriam, CV ;
Warren, Y ;
Tyrrell, KL .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (09) :2389-2394
[10]   CIPROFLOXACIN VS CEFOTAXIME REGIMENS FOR THE TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS [J].
HOOGKAMPKORSTANJE, JAA .
INFECTION, 1995, 23 (05) :278-282