Clinical analysis of propofol deep sedation for 1,104 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A three year prospective study

被引:41
作者
Gasparovic, Stojanka
Rustemovic, Nadan
Opacic, Milorad
Premuzic, Marina
Korusic, Andelko
Bozikov, Jadranka
Bates, Tamara
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Dubrava Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Ctr Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Zagreb 41000, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Zagreb 41000, Croatia
[4] Bates Clin, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
endoscopy; conscious sedation; propofol; hemodynamic adverse effects;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v12.i2.327
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To analyze the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of propofol on patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. METHODS: In this prospective study, conducted over a period of three years, 1,104 patients referred for a same day GI endoscopy procedure were analyzed. All patients were given a propofol bolus (0.5-1.5 mg/kg). Arterial blood pressure (BP) was monitored at 3 min intervals and heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) were recorded continuously by pulse oximetry. Analyzed data acquisition was carried out before, during, and after the procedure. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure was demonstrated (P < 0.001) when compared to pre-intervention values, but severe hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure below 60 mmHg, was noted in only 5 patients (0.5%). Oxygen saturation decreased from 96.5% to 94.4% (P < 0.001). A critical decrease in oxygen saturation (< 90%) was documented in 27 patients (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that propofol provided good sedation with excellent pain control, a short recovery time and no significant hemodynamic side effects if carefully titrated. All the patients (and especially ASA III group) require monitoring and care of an anesthesiologist. (c) 2006 The WIG Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 330
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   SLEEP APNEA, HYPOPNEA AND OXYGEN DESATURATION IN NORMAL SUBJECTS - STRONG MALE PREDOMINANCE [J].
BLOCK, AJ ;
BOYSEN, PG ;
WYNNE, JW ;
HUNT, LA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1979, 300 (10) :513-517
[2]  
Cacho G, 2000, Gastroenterol Hepatol, V23, P407
[3]  
Early DS, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P1862
[4]   Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation [J].
Eckardt, VF ;
Kanzler, G ;
Schmitt, T ;
Eckardt, AJ ;
Bernhard, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (05) :560-565
[5]   CONSCIOUS SEDATION, CLINICALLY RELEVANT COMPLICATIONS AND MONITORING OF ENDOSCOPY - RESULTS OF A NATIONWIDE SURVEY IN SWITZERLAND [J].
FROEHLICH, F ;
GONVERS, JJ ;
FRIED, M .
ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 26 (02) :231-234
[6]   Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: Patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Thorens, J ;
Schwizer, W ;
Preisig, M ;
Kohler, M ;
Hays, RD ;
Fried, M ;
Gonvers, JJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (01) :1-9
[7]   Comparison of colonoscopies performed under sedation with propofol or with midazolam or without sedation [J].
Gasparovic, S ;
Rustemovic, N ;
Opacic, M ;
Bates, M ;
Petrovecki, M .
ACTA MEDICA AUSTRIACA, 2003, 30 (01) :13-16
[8]   Propofol in the endoscopy suite: an anesthesiologist's perspective [J].
Graber, RG .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (06) :803-806
[9]   Pulse oximetry and supplemental oxygen during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A critical review [J].
Holm, C ;
Rosenberg, J .
ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 28 (08) :703-711
[10]   Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: Propofol is an alternative to midazolam [J].
Jung, M ;
Hofmann, C ;
Kiesslich, R ;
Brackertz, A .
ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (03) :233-238