Dynamic economic analysis on invasive species management: Some policy implications of catchability

被引:9
作者
Kotani, Koji [1 ]
Kakinaka, Makoto [1 ]
Matsuda, Hiroyuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Univ Japan, Int Dev Program, Grad Sch Int Relat, Niigata 9497277, Japan
[2] Yokohama Natl Univ, Fac Environm & Informat Sci, Hodogaya Ku, Kanagawa 2408501, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Bio-economic model; Catchability; Dynamic programming; Eradication; Invasive species management; ERADICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.mbs.2009.03.009
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The problem of controlling invasive species has emerged as a global issue. In response to invasive species threats, governments often propose eradication. This article challenges the eradication view by studying optimal strategies for controlling invasive species in a simple dynamic model. The analysis mainly focuses on deriving policy implications of catchability in a situation where a series of controlling actions incurs operational costs that derive from the fact that catchability depends on the current stock size of invasive species. We analytically demonstrate that the optimal policy changes drastically, depending on the sensitivity of catchability in response to a change in the stock size, as well as on the initial stock. If the sensitivity of catchability is sufficiently high, the constant escapement policy with some interior target level is optimal. In contrast, if the sensitivity of catchability is sufficiently low, there could exist a threshold of the initial stock which differentiates the optimal action between immediate eradication and giving-up without any control. In the intermediate range, immediate eradication, giving-up without any control, or more complex policies may be optimal. Numerical analysis is employed to present economic intuitions and insights in both analytically tractable and intractable cases. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
BOMFORD M, 1995, WILDLIFE SOC B, V23, P249
[2]   OPTIMAL CLEANUP OF HAZARDOUS WASTES [J].
CAPUTO, MR ;
WILEN, JE .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 36 (01) :217-243
[3]   PROFIT MAXIMIZATION AND EXTINCTION OF ANIMAL SPECIES [J].
CLARK, CW .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (04) :950-961
[4]   ON UNCERTAIN RENEWABLE RESOURCE STOCKS - OPTIMAL HARVEST POLICIES AND THE VALUE OF STOCK SURVEYS [J].
CLARK, CW ;
KIRKWOOD, GP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1986, 13 (03) :235-244
[5]  
Clout MN., 2002, TURNING THE TIDE, P1
[6]   The economics of non-convex ecosystems:: Introduction [J].
Dasgupta, P ;
Mäler, KG .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 26 (04) :499-525
[7]  
Fresard M., 2006, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V35, P78
[8]  
Kim C. S., 2006, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V35, P29
[9]   DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION WITH A NON-CONVEX TECHNOLOGY - THE CASE OF A LINEAR OBJECTIVE FUNCTION [J].
MAJUMDAR, M ;
MITRA, T .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1983, 50 (01) :143-151
[10]   The economics of shallow lakes [J].
Mäler, KG ;
Xepapadeas, A ;
De Zeeuw, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 26 (04) :603-624