HELIOSPHERIC PROPAGATION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS: COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL WSA-ENLIL plus CONE MODEL AND ANALYTICAL DRAG-BASED MODEL

被引:78
作者
Vrsnak, B. [1 ]
Temmer, M. [2 ]
Zic, T. [1 ]
Taktakishvili, A. [3 ,4 ]
Dumbovic, M. [1 ]
Moestl, C. [2 ,5 ]
Veronig, A. M. [2 ]
Mays, M. L. [3 ,4 ]
Odstrcil, D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Geodesy, Hvar Observ, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Graz Univ, Inst Phys, Kanzelhohe Observ IGAM, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[4] Catholic Univ Amer, Washington, DC 20064 USA
[5] Austrian Acad Sci, Space Res Inst, A-8042 Graz, Austria
[6] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
奥地利科学基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); methods: analytical; methods: numerical; methods: statistical; solar-terrestrial relations; solar wind; Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); AERODYNAMIC DRAG; SOLAR-WIND; ARRIVAL TIMES; CURRENT SHEET; AU; EARTH; DYNAMICS; KINEMATICS; PLASMA; CMES;
D O I
10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/21
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Real-time forecasting of the arrival of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) at Earth, based on remote solar observations, is one of the central issues of space-weather research. In this paper, we compare arrival-time predictions calculated applying the numerical "WSA-ENLIL+Cone model" and the analytical "drag-based model" (DBM). Both models use coronagraphic observations of CMEs as input data, thus providing an early space-weather forecast two to four days before the arrival of the disturbance at the Earth, depending on the CME speed. It is shown that both methods give very similar results if the drag parameter Gamma = 0.1 is used in DBM in combination with a background solar-wind speed of w = 400 km s(-1). For this combination, the mean value of the difference between arrival times calculated by ENLIL and DBM is (Delta) over bar = 0.09 +/- 9.0 hr with an average of the absolute-value differences of vertical bar Delta vertical bar = 7.1 hr. Comparing the observed arrivals (O) with the calculated ones (C) for ENLIL gives O - C = -0.3 +/- 16.9 hr and, analogously, O - C = +1.1 +/- 19.1 hr for DBM. Applying Gamma = 0.2 with w = 450 km s(-1) in DBM, one finds O - C = - 1.7 +/- 18.3 hr, with an average of the absolute-value differences of 14.8 hr, which is similar to that for ENLIL, 14.1 hr. Finally, we demonstrate that the prediction accuracy significantly degrades with increasing solar activity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Dynamics of coronal mass ejections in the interplanetary medium
    Borgazzi, A.
    Lara, A.
    Echer, E.
    Alves, M. V.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2009, 498 (03) : 885 - 889
  • [2] The large angle spectroscopic coronagraph (LASCO)
    Brueckner, GE
    Howard, RA
    Koomen, MJ
    Korendyke, CM
    Michels, DJ
    Moses, JD
    Socker, DG
    Dere, KP
    Lamy, PL
    Llebaria, A
    Bout, MV
    Schwenn, R
    Simnett, GM
    Bedford, DK
    Eyles, CJ
    [J]. SOLAR PHYSICS, 1995, 162 (1-2) : 357 - 402
  • [3] On the aerodynamic drag force acting on interplanetary coronal mass ejections
    Cargill, PJ
    [J]. SOLAR PHYSICS, 2004, 221 (01) : 135 - 149
  • [4] Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the motion of magnetic flux tubes through a magnetized plasma
    Cargill, PJ
    Chen, J
    Spicer, DS
    Zalesak, ST
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1996, 101 (A3) : 4855 - 4870
  • [5] Quantitative comparison of methods for predicting the arrival of coronal mass ejections at Earth based on multiview imaging
    Colaninno, R. C.
    Vourlidas, A.
    Wu, C. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2013, 118 (11) : 6866 - 6879
  • [6] Investigations of the sensitivity of a coronal mass ejection model (ENLIL) to solar input parameters
    Falkenberg, T. V.
    Vrsnak, B.
    Taktakishvili, A.
    Odstrcil, D.
    MacNeice, P.
    Hesse, M.
    [J]. SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 8
  • [7] Predicting the 1-AU arrival times of coronal mass ejections
    Gopalswamy, N
    Lara, A
    Yashiro, S
    Kaiser, ML
    Howard, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2001, 106 (A12) : 29207 - 29217
  • [8] Sun Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (SECCHI)
    Howard, R. A.
    Moses, J. D.
    Vourlidas, A.
    Newmark, J. S.
    Socker, D. G.
    Plunkett, S. P.
    Korendyke, C. M.
    Cook, J. W.
    Hurley, A.
    Davila, J. M.
    Thompson, W. T.
    St Cyr, O. C.
    Mentzell, E.
    Mehalick, K.
    Lemen, J. R.
    Wuelser, J. P.
    Duncan, D. W.
    Tarbell, T. D.
    Wolfson, C. J.
    Moore, A.
    Harrison, R. A.
    Waltham, N. R.
    Lang, J.
    Davis, C. J.
    Eyles, C. J.
    Mapson-Menard, H.
    Simnett, G. M.
    Halain, J. P.
    Defise, J. M.
    Mazy, E.
    Rochus, P.
    Mercier, R.
    Ravet, M. F.
    Delmotte, F.
    Auchere, F.
    Delaboudiniere, J. P.
    Bothmer, V.
    Deutsch, W.
    Wang, D.
    Rich, N.
    Cooper, S.
    Stephens, V.
    Maahs, G.
    Baugh, R.
    McMullin, D.
    Carter, T.
    [J]. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2008, 136 (1-4) : 67 - 115
  • [9] Geoeffectivity of coronal mass ejections
    Koskinen, H. E. J.
    Huttunen, K. E. J.
    [J]. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2006, 124 (1-4) : 169 - 181
  • [10] Dynamics of interplanetary CMEs and associated type II bursts
    Lara, Alejandro
    Borgazzi, Andrea I.
    [J]. UNIVERSAL HELIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES, 2009, (257): : 287 - 290