Likelihood of additional work-up among women undergoing routine screening mammography: the impact of age, breast density, and hormone therapy use

被引:27
作者
Carney, PA
Kasales, CJ
Tosteson, ANA
Weiss, JE
Goodrich, ME
Poplack, SP
Wells, WS
Titus-Ernstoff, L
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
work-up; mammography; hormone therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Mammography screening can involve subsequent work-up to determine a final screening outcome. Understanding the likelihood of different events that follow initial screening is important if women and their health care providers are to be accurately informed about the screening process. Methods. We conducted an analysis of additional work-up following screening mammography to characterize use of supplemental imaging and recommendations for biopsy and/or surgical consultation and the factors associated with their use. We included all events following screening mammography performed between 1/1/1998 and 12/31/1999 on a population-based sample of 37,632 New Hampshire women. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for supplemental imaging and recommended biopsy and/or surgical consultation as function of age, menopausal status and HRT use, breast density, and family history of breast cancer. Results. Ninety-one percent of women (n = 34,445) did not require supplemental imaging. Among those who did (n = 3,187), 84% had additional views, 9% ultrasound, and 7% received both. Supplemental imaging was affected by age (OR 0.84; 95% CI = 0.76-0.94 for 5059; OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.58-0.75 for greater than or equal to 60 versus < 50), menopausal status, and HRT use (OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.21-1.47 for peri- or post-menopausal HRT users; OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.01-1.29 for premenopausal versus peri- or post-menopausal non-HRT users), breast density (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.33-1.55 for dense versus fatty breasts) and family history (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.06-1.25 for any versus none). In women with supplemental imaging, age (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.11-2.90 for 60, relative to <50) and imaging type (OR = 3.23; 95% CI = 2.38-4.38 for ultrasound with or without additional views versus additional views only) were significantly associated with biopsy and/or surgical consultation recommendation. In those with no supplemental imaging, breast density was associated with recommended biopsy and/or surgical consultation (OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.13-2.07 for dense versus fatty breasts). Conclusions. Breast density and HRT use are both independent predictors of use of supplemental imaging in women. With advancing age (age 60 and older), women were less likely to require follow-up imaging but more likely to receive a recommendation for biopsy and/or surgical consultation. This information should be used to inform women about the likelihood of services received as part of the screening work-up. (C) 2004 The Institute for Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 55
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   THE RELATIONSHIP OF HIGH-RISK MAMMOGRAPHIC PATTERNS TO HISTOLOGICAL RISK-FACTORS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER IN THE HUMAN BREAST [J].
ARTHUR, JE ;
ELLIS, IO ;
FLOWERS, C ;
ROEBUCK, E ;
ELSTON, CW ;
BLAMEY, RW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (755) :845-849
[2]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[3]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[4]   A CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS AND ASSOCIATED RISK-FACTORS FOR HUMAN MAMMARY-CARCINOMA [J].
BLAND, KI ;
KUHNS, JG ;
BUCHANAN, JB ;
DWYER, PA ;
HEUSER, LF ;
OCONNOR, CA ;
GRAY, LA ;
POLK, HC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1982, 195 (05) :582-594
[5]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[6]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC AND HISTOLOGICAL RISK-FACTORS FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
BOYD, NF ;
JENSEN, HM ;
COOKE, G ;
HAN, HL .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1992, 84 (15) :1170-1179
[7]   Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance [J].
Brett, J ;
Austoker, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 2001, 23 (04) :292-300
[8]   Integrating self-referral for mammography into organised screening: results from an Italian experience [J].
Bucchi, L ;
Falcini, F ;
Baraldi, GP ;
Bondi, A ;
Bonsanto, R ;
Bravetti, P ;
Desiderio, F ;
de Bianchi, PS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2003, 10 (03) :134-138
[9]   The new hampshire mammography network: The development and design of a population-based registry [J].
Carney, PA ;
Poplack, SP ;
Wells, WA ;
Littenberg, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (02) :367-372
[10]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008