Substance Use and Recidivism Outcomes for Prison-Based Drug and Alcohol Interventions

被引:58
作者
de Andrade, Dominique [1 ,2 ]
Ritchie, Jessica [3 ]
Rowlands, Michael [4 ]
Mann, Emily [5 ]
Hides, Leanne [6 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Ctr Youth Substance Abuse Res,Inst Hlth & Biomed, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Griffith Criminol Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Fac Business Econ & Law, TC Beirne Sch Law, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Ctr Accid Res & Rd Safety Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth & SocialWork, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Fac Hlth & Behav Sci, Sch Psychol, Lives Lived Well Res Grp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
health policy; prisoner; substance abuse; substance addiction; vulnerable populations; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; THERAPEUTIC-COMMUNITY TREATMENT; METHADONE-MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY-DISORDER; EXTENDED-RELEASE NALTREXONE; 4-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; COMMITMENT THERAPY; SUBSTITUTION TREATMENT; MULTISITE EVALUATION; TREATMENT PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1093/epirev/mxy004
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We conducted a systematic review to examine the substance use and recidivism outcomes of prison-based substance use interventions. We searched public health, criminology, and psychology databases, and conducted forward and backward snowballing methods to identify additional studies. Studies were included if they were published between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2017; were published in English; and reported substance use and/or recidivism outcomes of prison-based substance use interventions. Studies were reviewed for methodological rigor using the Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Our search returned 49 studies: 6 were methodologically strong, 20 were moderate, and 23 were weak. Results suggest therapeutic communities are effective in reducing recidivism and, to a lesser extent substance use after release. There is also evidence to suggest that opioid maintenance treatment is effective in reducing the risk of drug use after release from prison for opioid users. Furthermore, care after release from prison appears to enhance treatment effects for both types of interventions. Results provide evidence that policymakers can use to make informed decisions on best-practice approaches when addressing prisoner substance dependence and improving long-term outcomes. This comprehensive review highlights the difficulties of conducting quality research in the prison setting and suggests innovative study design for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 133
页数:13
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK - A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED METAANALYSIS
    ANDREWS, DA
    ZINGER, I
    HOGE, RD
    BONTA, J
    GENDREAU, P
    CULLEN, FT
    [J]. CRIMINOLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) : 369 - 404
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, POSTRELEASE EXPERIEN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, DRUG USE MONITORING
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1993, WHO GUID HIV INF AID
  • [5] [Anonymous], OFFENDER REHABILITAT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2015, HLTH AUSTR PRIS 2015
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, Key findings from the drug use careers of offenders (DUCO) study
  • [8] [Anonymous], OFFENDER REHABILITAT
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2015, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2015.07.345
  • [10] [Anonymous], J CORRECT HLTH CARE