HepPar1, MOC-31, pCEA, mCEA and CD10 for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma vs. metastatic adenocarcinoma in liver fine needle aspirates

被引:43
作者
Wang, Luoquan [1 ]
Vuolo, Magalis [1 ]
Suhrland, Mark J. [1 ]
Schlesinger, Kathie [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
hepatocellular; carcinoma; adenocarcinoma; immunohistochemistry; liver cancer;
D O I
10.1159/000325951
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate immunohistochemical staining of hepatocyte paraffin-1 (HepPar1), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (pCEA), monoclonal CFA (mCEA) MOC-31 and CD10 for differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from metastatic adenocarcinoma (MA) on fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Study Design Fifty-one archival, paraffin-embedded FNAB cell blocks, representing 18 HCCs and 33 MAs, were immunostained with antibodies for AFP, CD10, pCEA, mCEA, HepPar1 and MOC-31. Results HepPar1, AFP, canalicular pCEA and CD10 were positive in 78% (14 of 18), 28% (5 of 18), 72 % (13 of 18) and 35% (6 of 17) of cases of HCC respectively. The 33 MAs were negative for immunostaining of the above antibodies except for one AFP-positive AM. Ninety-seven percent (31 of 32) of the MAs and 6% (1 of 17) of the HCCs were positive for MOC-31. Monoclonal CEA was immunoreactive on 82% (27 of 33) of the MAs and negative on all the HCCs. Conclusion HepPar1 was the most sensitive marker for HCC, followed by canalicular staining for pCEA. For MA, MOC-31 was the most sensitive marker; mCEA was slightly less sensitive but more specific. We suggest using HepPar1, pCEA, CD10, MOC-31 and mCEA as a panel for distinguishing HCC from MA in liver FNAB.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma [J].
Lau, SK ;
Prakash, S ;
Geller, SA ;
Alsabeh, R .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 33 (12) :1175-1181
[22]  
Leong ASY, 1998, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V33, P318
[23]   Diagnostic utility of CD10 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the liver [J].
Lin, F ;
Abdallah, H ;
Meschter, S .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 30 (02) :92-97
[24]   COMPARATIVE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF PRIMARY AND METASTATIC CARCINOMAS OF THE LIVER [J].
MA, CK ;
ZARBO, RJ ;
FRIERSON, HF ;
LEE, MW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 99 (05) :551-557
[25]  
Maeda T, 1996, MODERN PATHOL, V9, P901
[26]  
Morgan RL, 1999, CANCER CYTOPATHOL, V87, P390, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991225)87:6<390::AID-CNCR10>3.0.CO
[27]  
2-4
[28]   Rapid quality control analysis of 13C-enriched substrate synthesis by isotope ratio mass spectrometry [J].
Morrison, DJ ;
Dodson, B ;
Preston, T ;
Weaver, LT .
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2001, 15 (15) :1279-1282
[29]  
Niemann TH, 1999, CANCER CYTOPATHOL, V87, P295, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991025)87:5<295::AID-CNCR9>3.3.CO
[30]  
2-T