Opportunities and challenges in conducting systematic reviews to support the development of nutrient reference values: vitamin A as an example

被引:24
作者
Russell, Robert [2 ,3 ]
Chung, Mei [4 ]
Balk, Ethan M. [4 ]
Atkinson, Stephanie [5 ]
Giovannucci, Edward L. [6 ,7 ]
Ip, Stanley [4 ]
Lichtenstein, Alice H. [2 ,4 ]
Mayne, Susan Taylor [8 ]
Raman, Gowri [4 ]
Ross, A. Catharine [9 ]
Trikalinos, Thomas A. [4 ]
West, Keith P., Jr. [10 ]
Lau, Joseph [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, USDA, Human Nutr Res Ctr Aging, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Off Dietary Supplements, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Tufts Med Ctr, Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[9] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
QUALITY;
D O I
10.3945/ajcn.2008.27154
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Nutrient reference values have significant public health and policy implications. Given the importance of defining reliable nutrient reference values, there is a need for an explicit, objective, and transparent process to set these values. The Tufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center assembled a group of nutrition experts from academic institutions and federal government agencies, led participants in discussions, conducted exercises in formulating questions and evidence review criteria that would be amenable to systematic reviews of the scientific literature, performed a literature search on the questions to identify potentially relevant publications, and identified challenges and limitations of applying this method to support the development of nutrient reference values using vitamin A as an example. The workgroup concluded that the systematic review approach could be productively used to inform the development of reference values. Challenges identified in this exercise include prioritizing and defining research questions when the volume of literature is large, relying on intermediate (surrogate) outcomes when few or no studies directly linking nutrient intake with clinical outcomes are available, and determining reliable nutrient biomarkers. Ultimately, an objective, unbiased systematic review of a defined question could be useful, not only in helping to set nutrient reference values, but also for increasing the transparency of the decision making process. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89: 728-33.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 733
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*AM MED ASS, 2002, US GUID MED LIT MAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DIETARY REFERENCE IN, DOI DOI 10.17226/10490
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, DIET REF INT THIAM R
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, DIETARY REFERENCE IN, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00596-7
[5]   Laboratory issues: Use of nutritional biomarkers [J].
Blanck, HM ;
Bowman, BA ;
Cooper, GR ;
Myers, GL ;
Miller, DT .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2003, 133 (03) :888S-894S
[6]  
Chalmers I., 1995, Systematic reviews
[7]  
*COCHR COLL, 2008, COCHR HDB
[8]   Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews [J].
Counsell, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (05) :380-387
[9]   The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions [J].
Downs, SH ;
Black, N .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) :377-384
[10]  
European Commission, 2002, OP SCI COMM FOOD TOL