Primary Care Providers' Initial Evaluation of Children with Global Developmental Delay: A Clinical Vignette Study

被引:11
|
作者
Tarini, Beth A. [1 ]
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. [2 ,3 ]
Saal, Howard M. [4 ,5 ]
Edmondson, Laurie [1 ]
Uhlmann, Wendy R. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Pediat, Child Hlth Evaluat & Res Unit, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Human Genet, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[5] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Human Genet, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
QUALITY-STANDARDS-SUBCOMMITTEE; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; PRACTICE-COMMITTEE; NEUROLOGY-SOCIETY; AMERICAN-ACADEMY; WORKFORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.08.065
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective To examine the decisions of pediatric primary care physicians about their diagnostic evaluation for a child with suspected global developmental delay (GDD). Study design A survey was mailed to a sample of pediatricians (n = 600) and family physicians (n = 600) randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. The survey contained a clinical vignette describing a 9-month-old nondysmorphic boy with GDD. Participants were asked their initial evaluation steps (test, refer, or both test and refer) and what types of referral and/or testing they would pursue. We examined bivariate associations between physician/clinical practice characteristics and participants' evaluation decision. Results More pediatricians than family physicians completed the survey (response rates: 55% vs 38%). Almost three-quarters of the respondents (74%) reported that their first step in a diagnostic evaluation would be to refer the child without testing, 22% would test only, and 4% would both test and refer. As their initial step, most physicians referred to a developmental pediatrician (58%), and only 5% would refer to a geneticist. The most commonly ordered test was general biochemical testing (64%). The most commonly ordered genetic test was a karyotype (39%). Conclusions When evaluating a child with GDD, few primary care physicians would order genetic testing or refer to a genetics specialist as a first evaluation step. Future studies should examine both barriers to and utilization of a genetic evaluation for children with GDD.
引用
收藏
页码:1404 / +
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The prevalence and socioeconomic determinants of undetected developmental delay in preschool-aged children in the northwest of Iran: a population-based study
    Hosseinpour, Marjan
    Aghdam, Mohammad Esmaeilpour
    Maleki, Farzad
    EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2021, 191 (10) : 1624 - 1635
  • [42] The clinical benefit of array-based comparative genomic hybridization for detection of copy number variants in Czech children with intellectual disability and developmental delay
    Marketa Wayhelova
    Jan Smetana
    Vladimira Vallova
    Eva Hladilkova
    Hana Filkova
    Marta Hanakova
    Marcela Vilemova
    Petra Nikolova
    Barbora Gromesova
    Renata Gaillyova
    Petr Kuglik
    BMC Medical Genomics, 12
  • [43] The clinical benefit of array-based comparative genomic hybridization for detection of copy number variants in Czech children with intellectual disability and developmental delay
    Wayhelova, Marketa
    Smetana, Jan
    Vallova, Vladimira
    Hladilkova, Eva
    Filkova, Hana
    Hanakova, Marta
    Vilemova, Marcela
    Nikolova, Petra
    Gromesova, Barbora
    Gaillyova, Renata
    Kuglik, Petr
    BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2019, 12 (1)
  • [44] New Approach to Intelligence Screening for Children With Global Development Delay Using Eye-Tracking Technology: A Pilot Study
    Xu, Hong
    Xuan, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Li
    Zhang, Wenxin
    Zhu, Min
    Zhao, Xiaoke
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [45] Prospective Characterisation of Age-Related Changes in Self-Injurious Behaviour in a Sample of Children With Global Developmental Delay Aged 2-12 Years
    Byiers, Breanne J.
    Gunderson, Jaclyn
    Huebner, Andrea
    Symons, Frank J.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2025, 69 (06) : 465 - 479
  • [46] Accessibility of Virtual Primary Care for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study
    Selick, Avra
    Durbin, Janet
    Hamdani, Yani
    Rayner, Jennifer
    Lunsky, Yona
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (08)
  • [47] How new clinical roles in primary care impact on equitable distribution of workforce: a retrospective study
    Hutchinson, Joseph
    Lau, Yiu-Shing
    Sutton, Matt
    Checkland, Kath
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (734) : E659 - E666
  • [48] Evidence Report: Genetic and metabolic testing on children with global developmental delay Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society
    Michelson, D. J.
    Shevell, M. I.
    Sherr, E. H.
    Moeschler, J. B.
    Gropman, A. L.
    Ashwal, S.
    NEUROLOGY, 2011, 77 (17) : 1629 - 1635
  • [49] Virtual Education Program to Support Providers Caring for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rapid Development and Evaluation Study
    Thakur, Anupam
    Pereira, Cheryl
    Hardy, Jenny
    Bobbette, Nicole
    Sockalingam, Sanjeev
    Lunsky, Yona
    JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 8 (10):
  • [50] Whole Exome Sequencing and Panel-Based Analysis in 176 Spanish Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Focus on Autism Spectrum Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability/Global Developmental Delay
    Sanchez Suarez, Ariadna
    Martinez Menendez, Beatriz
    Escolar Escamilla, Eduardo
    Martinez Sarries, Francisco J.
    Esparza Garrido, Miren Iranzu
    Gil-Fournier, Belen
    Ramiro Leon, Soraya
    Rubio Gribble, Barbara
    Quesada Espinosa, Juan F.
    Alcaraz Romero, Andres J.
    GENES, 2024, 15 (10)