State-level variation of initial COVID-19 dynamics in the United States

被引:57
作者
White, Easton R. [1 ,2 ]
Hebert-Dufresne, Laurent [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Biol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Environm, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Comp Sci, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Vermont Complex Syst Ctr, Burlington, VT USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DISPERSAL; EPIDEMIC;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0240648
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
During an epidemic, metrics such asR(0), doubling time, and case fatality rates are important in understanding and predicting the course of an epidemic. However, if collected over country or regional scales, these metrics hide important smaller-scale, local dynamics. We examine how commonly used epidemiological metrics differ for each individual state within the United States during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. We found that the detected case number and trajectory of early detected cases differ considerably between states. We then test for correlations with testing protocols, interventions and population characteristics. We find that epidemic dynamics were most strongly associated with non-pharmaceutical government actions during the early phase of the epidemic. In particular, early social distancing restrictions, particularly on restaurant operations, was correlated with increased doubling times. Interestingly, we also found that states with little tolerance for deviance from enforced rules saw faster early epidemic growth. Together with other correlates such as population density, our results highlight the different factors involved in the heterogeneity in the early spread of COVID-19 throughout the United States. Although individual states are clearly not independent, they can serve as small, natural experiments in how different demographic patterns and government responses can impact the course of an epidemic.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19 [J].
Adolph, Christopher ;
Amano, Kenya ;
Bang-Jensen, Bree ;
Fullman, Nancy ;
Wilkerson, John .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2021, 46 (02) :211-233
[2]  
Althouse Benjamin M, 2020, medRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2020.08.21.20179473
[3]   How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? [J].
Anderson, Roy M. ;
Heesterbeek, Hans ;
Klinkenberg, Don ;
Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10228) :931-934
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V7, P1, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30483-3
[5]   Metapopulation epidemic models with heterogeneous mixing and travel behaviour [J].
Apolloni, Andrea ;
Poletto, Chiara ;
Ramasco, Jose J. ;
Jensen, Pablo ;
Colizza, Vittoria .
THEORETICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICAL MODELLING, 2014, 11
[6]   Association Between Statewide School Closure and COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in the US [J].
Auger, Katherine A. ;
Shah, Samir S. ;
Richardson, Troy ;
Hartley, David ;
Hall, Matthew ;
Warniment, Amanda ;
Timmons, Kristen ;
Bosse, Dianna ;
Ferris, Sarah A. ;
Brady, Patrick W. ;
Schondelmeyer, Amanda C. ;
Thomson, Joanna E. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (09) :859-870
[7]  
Chin Taylor, 2020, medRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.08.20058248
[8]  
China-WHO Expert Team, 2020, Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
[9]  
Chinazzi M, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P395, DOI [10.1126/science.aba9757, 10.1101/2020.02.09.20021261]
[10]   Strong Social Distancing Measures In The United States Reduced The COVID-19 Growth Rate [J].
Courtemanche, Charles ;
Garuccio, Joseph ;
Le, Anh ;
Pinkston, Joshua ;
Yelowitz, Aaron .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (07) :1237-1246