Cost-effectiveness of microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck defects after oncologic resection

被引:39
作者
Gao, Lin Lin [1 ]
Basta, Marten [2 ]
Kanchwala, Suhail K. [1 ]
Serletti, Joseph M. [1 ]
Low, David W. [1 ]
Wu, Liza C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2017年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
head and neck; cost effectiveness; Markov model; microsurgical reconstruction; locoregional reconstruction; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; MAJOR MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; FREE TISSUE TRANSFER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PEDICLED FLAP; CANCER PATIENTS; ORAL-CAVITY; COMPLICATIONS; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/hed.24644
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. Microvascular free tissue transfer has become the main technique used for head and neck reconstruction. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of free flap reconstruction for head and neck defects after oncologic resection for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods. We developed a Markov model of the cost, quality of life, survival, and incremental cost-effectiveness of reconstruction with free tissue transfer compared with locoregional flaps. Health state probabilities and quality of life scores were determined from literature. Costs were determined from institutional experience. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results. Free flap reconstruction was more costly than pedicled flap but associated with greater quality of life with no survival benefit. A value <$50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was defined as cost-effective. The incremental cost-effectiveness for head and neck free flap reconstruction was below the threshold and, therefore, free flap reconstruction is cost-effective. Reconstruction was more cost-effective for patients with lower stage cancers: $4643 per QALY for stage I SCC, $8226 for stage II, $17,269 for stage III, and $23,324 for stage IV. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed the cost-effectiveness would remain <$50,000 for all stages of SCC for all variables except for QALY after locoregional reconstruction without complications. Conclusion. Microsurgical head and neck reconstruction is cost-effective compared with locoregional flaps, even more so in patients with earlystage cancer. This finding supports the current practice of free flap head and neck reconstruction. Screening and early detection are important to optimize costs. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Surgical approach to head and neck cancer and postoperative complications: Are all patients eligible? [J].
Annacontini, Luigi ;
Parisi, Domenico ;
Gozzo, Giuseppe ;
Campanale, Antonella ;
Maiorella, Arianna ;
Portincasa, Aurelio .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (02) :675-676
[2]  
Berenholz L, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V28, P285
[3]   Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Bernier, J ;
Domenge, C ;
Ozsahin, M ;
Matuszewska, K ;
Lefèbvre, JL ;
Greiner, RH ;
Giralt, J ;
Maingon, P ;
Rolland, F ;
Bolla, M ;
Cognetti, F ;
Bourhis, J ;
Kirkpatrick, A ;
van Glabbeke, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (19) :1945-1952
[4]   Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival [J].
Bonner, James A. ;
Harari, Paul M. ;
Giralt, Jordi ;
Cohen, Roger B. ;
Jones, Christopher U. ;
Sur, Ranjan K. ;
Raben, David ;
Baselga, Jose ;
Spencer, Sharon A. ;
Zhu, Junming ;
Youssoufian, Hagop ;
Rowinsky, Eric K. ;
Ang, K. Kian .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01) :21-28
[5]   THE INFERIOR TRAPEZIUS MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION [J].
CHANDRASEKHAR, B ;
TERZ, JJ ;
KOKAL, WA ;
BEATTY, JD ;
GOTTLIEB, ME .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1988, 21 (03) :201-209
[6]   The impact of clinical pathways on the practice of head and neck oncologic surgery - The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience [J].
Chen, AY ;
Callender, D ;
Mansyur, C ;
Reyna, KM ;
Limitone, E ;
Goepfert, H .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (03) :322-326
[7]   Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap vs revascularized free tissue transfer - Complications, gastrostomy tube dependence, and hospitalization [J].
Chepeha, DB ;
Annich, G ;
Pynnonen, MA ;
Beck, J ;
Wolf, GT ;
Teknos, TN ;
Bradford, CR ;
Carroll, WR ;
Esclamado, RM .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2004, 130 (02) :181-186
[8]   Microvascular reconstruction and tracheotomy are significant determinants of resource utilization in head and neck surgery [J].
Cohen, J ;
Stock, M ;
Chan, B ;
Meininger, M ;
Wax, M ;
Andersen, P ;
Everts, E .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (08) :947-949
[9]   Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck [J].
Cooper, JS ;
Pajak, TF ;
Forastiere, AA ;
Jacobs, J ;
Campbell, BH ;
Saxman, SB ;
Kish, JA ;
Kim, HE ;
Cmelak, AJ ;
Rotman, M ;
Machtay, M ;
Ensley, JF ;
Chao, KSC ;
Schultz, CJ ;
Lee, N ;
Fu, KK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (19) :1937-1944
[10]   Free radial forearm flap versus pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal defects:: a cost analysis [J].
de Bree, R. ;
Reith, R. ;
Quak, J. J. ;
Uyl-de, Groot C. A. ;
van Agthoven, M. ;
Leemans, C. R. .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 32 (04) :275-282