Factor price distortions, environmental regulation and innovation efficiency: An empirical study on China's power enterprises

被引:52
作者
Qiao, Sen [1 ]
Zhao, Dong Hao [1 ]
Guo, Zi Xin [1 ]
Tao, Zhang [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Business, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[2] Nanning Normal Univ, Sch Logist Management & Engn, Nanning 530001, Peoples R China
关键词
Factor price distortions; Environmental regulation; Innovation efficiency; Power enterprises; FACTOR MARKET DISTORTION; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; ENERGY; IMPACT; MISALLOCATION; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112887
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Strengthening environmental regulation is an important measure to solve energy and environmental problems in the process of factor pricing reform in China. Using fixed effect and system-GMM models, this paper explores the impact of factor price distortions and environmental regulation on innovation efficiency of 59 listed power enterprises in China from 2005 to 2019. The results show that: In the direct path, both capital and labor price distortions inhibit innovation efficiency, and the inhibitory effect of labor price distortions in state-owned power enterprises is more significant. For the indirect path, both economical and supervised environmental regulation promote the innovation efficiency of state-owned and non-state-owned power enterprises, while legal environmental regulation is the opposite, which shows that environmental regulation has significant "cost effect" and "rebound effect". In addition, economical, legal and supervised environmental regulation have positive moderating effects on the relationship between capital price distortions, labor price distortions and innovation efficiency, which alleviates the inhibitory effect of capital and labor price distortions on innovation efficiency. Furthermore, economical and supervised environmental regulation have significant positive moderating effects on both state-owned and non-state-owned power enterprises, while the positive moderating effect of legal environmental regulation is only in non-state-owned power enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Technological Progress, Innovation and Economic Growth; the Case of Turkey [J].
Adak, Mehmet .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, :776-782
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Statistical yearbook of urban and rural
[3]   An integrated, DEA PCA numerical taxonomy approach for energy efficiency assessment and consumption optimization in energy intensive manufacturing sectors [J].
Azadeh, A. ;
Amalnick, M. S. ;
Ghaderi, S. F. ;
Asadzadeh, S. M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (07) :3792-3806
[4]   Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Tombe, Trevor ;
Zhu, Xiaodong .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 16 (01) :39-58
[5]   Structural change accounting with labor market distortions [J].
Cai, Wenbiao .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2015, 57 :54-64
[6]   Dual-track interest rates and capital misallocation [J].
Chen, Shiyi ;
Lin, Bin .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 57
[7]   Firm's outward foreign direct investment and efficiency loss of factor price distortion: Evidence from Chinese firms [J].
Cheng, Hua ;
Wang, Ziqi ;
Peng, Dan ;
Kong, Qunxi .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 67 :176-188
[8]   Market distortions and aggregate productivity: Evidence from Chinese energy enterprises [J].
Dai, Xiaoyong ;
Cheng, Liwei .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 95 :304-313
[9]   Environmental Regulations Become Restriction or a Cause for Innovation - A Case Study of Toyota Prius and Nissan Leaf [J].
Debnath, Sajit Chandra .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, :324-333
[10]   Role of rent-seeking or technological progress in maintaining the monopoly power of energy enterprises: An empirical analysis based on micro-data from China [J].
Du, Weijian ;
Li, Mengjie ;
Wang, Faming .
ENERGY, 2020, 202