Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive pancreatic resection

被引:14
作者
Joechle, Katharina [1 ]
Conrad, Claudius [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, 1400 Pressler,Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreas; Pancreatic resection; LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1002/jhbp.558
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
While clinical outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR) compared to open surgery are well examined, only few studies focus on its associated cost. The aim of this study is to evaluate cost analyses comparing MIPR to open pancreatic resection (OPR). A systematic review of the literature using PubMed of all published studies between 2000 and 2017 was performed. Studies reporting on cost of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) compared to open surgery were identified. Fourteen studies were included, eight that reported a cost comparison between LDP and open surgery and six that compared costs between LPD and open surgery. For both, LDP and LPD, operative costs were higher due to higher costs for surgical equipment. Reports suggest that lower postoperative costs for LDP and LPD could balance out the operative costs resulting in overall decreased costs for the laparoscopic compared to the open approach. Recent results show a positive trend towards cost savings for MIPR. To assess the overall benefit of MIPR compared to OPR comprehensive cost analyses and long-term quality outcomes need to be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Hamdan, Mohammed
    Di Fabio, Francesco
    Pearce, Neil W.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1670 - 1674
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, COST EFFECT RESOUR A, DOI DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-6-9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
  • [4] Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease
    Cho, Akihiro
    Yamamoto, Hiroshi
    Nagata, Matsuo
    Takiguchi, Nobuhiro
    Shimada, Hideaki
    Kainuma, Osamu
    Souda, Hiroaki
    Gunji, Hisashi
    Miyazaki, Akinari
    Ikeda, Atsushi
    Tohma, Tomoko
    Matsumoto, Ikuko
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (03) : 445 - 449
  • [5] Comparable long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis
    Conrad, Claudius
    Basso, Valeria
    Passot, Guillaume
    Zorzi, Daria
    Li, Liang
    Chen, Hsiang-Chun
    Fuks, David
    Gayet, Brice
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (10): : 3970 - 3978
  • [6] Doula C, 2016, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V26, P6, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000228
  • [7] Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy
    Eom, B. W.
    Jang, J. -Y.
    Lee, S. E.
    Han, H. -S.
    Yoon, Y. -S.
    Kim, S. -W.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (05): : 1334 - 1338
  • [8] Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center
    Fox, Adrian M.
    Pitzul, Kristen
    Bhojani, Faizal
    Kaplan, Max
    Moulton, Carol-Anne
    Wei, Alice C.
    McGilvray, Ian
    Cleary, Sean
    Okrainec, Allan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (05): : 1220 - 1230
  • [9] Analysis of the Cost Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy
    Gerber, Michael H.
    Delitto, Daniel
    Crippen, Cristina J.
    George, Thomas J., Jr.
    Behrns, Kevin E.
    Trevino, Jose G.
    Cioffi, Jessica L.
    Hughes, Steven J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (09) : 1404 - 1410
  • [10] Howick J., OXFORD CTR EVIDENCE