Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive pancreatic resection

被引:14
作者
Joechle, Katharina [1 ]
Conrad, Claudius [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, 1400 Pressler,Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreas; Pancreatic resection; LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1002/jhbp.558
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
While clinical outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR) compared to open surgery are well examined, only few studies focus on its associated cost. The aim of this study is to evaluate cost analyses comparing MIPR to open pancreatic resection (OPR). A systematic review of the literature using PubMed of all published studies between 2000 and 2017 was performed. Studies reporting on cost of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) compared to open surgery were identified. Fourteen studies were included, eight that reported a cost comparison between LDP and open surgery and six that compared costs between LPD and open surgery. For both, LDP and LPD, operative costs were higher due to higher costs for surgical equipment. Reports suggest that lower postoperative costs for LDP and LPD could balance out the operative costs resulting in overall decreased costs for the laparoscopic compared to the open approach. Recent results show a positive trend towards cost savings for MIPR. To assess the overall benefit of MIPR compared to OPR comprehensive cost analyses and long-term quality outcomes need to be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study [J].
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Hamdan, Mohammed ;
Di Fabio, Francesco ;
Pearce, Neil W. ;
Johnson, Colin D. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06) :1670-1674
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COST EFFECT RESOUR A, DOI DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-6-9
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
[4]   Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease [J].
Cho, Akihiro ;
Yamamoto, Hiroshi ;
Nagata, Matsuo ;
Takiguchi, Nobuhiro ;
Shimada, Hideaki ;
Kainuma, Osamu ;
Souda, Hiroaki ;
Gunji, Hisashi ;
Miyazaki, Akinari ;
Ikeda, Atsushi ;
Tohma, Tomoko ;
Matsumoto, Ikuko .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (03) :445-449
[5]   Comparable long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis [J].
Conrad, Claudius ;
Basso, Valeria ;
Passot, Guillaume ;
Zorzi, Daria ;
Li, Liang ;
Chen, Hsiang-Chun ;
Fuks, David ;
Gayet, Brice .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (10) :3970-3978
[6]  
Doula C, 2016, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V26, P6, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000228
[7]   Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy [J].
Eom, B. W. ;
Jang, J. -Y. ;
Lee, S. E. ;
Han, H. -S. ;
Yoon, Y. -S. ;
Kim, S. -W. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (05) :1334-1338
[8]   Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center [J].
Fox, Adrian M. ;
Pitzul, Kristen ;
Bhojani, Faizal ;
Kaplan, Max ;
Moulton, Carol-Anne ;
Wei, Alice C. ;
McGilvray, Ian ;
Cleary, Sean ;
Okrainec, Allan .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (05) :1220-1230
[9]   Analysis of the Cost Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy [J].
Gerber, Michael H. ;
Delitto, Daniel ;
Crippen, Cristina J. ;
George, Thomas J., Jr. ;
Behrns, Kevin E. ;
Trevino, Jose G. ;
Cioffi, Jessica L. ;
Hughes, Steven J. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (09) :1404-1410
[10]  
Howick J., OXFORD CTR EVIDENCE