Constraining plant functional types in a semi-arid ecosystem with waveform lidar

被引:12
作者
Ilangakoon, Nayani T. [1 ]
Glenn, Nancy F. [1 ]
Dashti, Hamid [1 ]
Painter, Thomas H. [2 ]
Mikesell, T. Dylan [3 ]
Spaete, Lucas P. [1 ]
Mitchell, Jessica J. [4 ]
Shannon, Kyle [5 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Dept Geosci, 1910 Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[2] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[3] Boise State Univ, Dept Geosci, Environm Seismol Lab, 1910 Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[4] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Geog & Planning, 572 Rivers St, Boone, NC 28606 USA
[5] Boise State Univ, Res Comp, 1910 Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83725 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Airborne Snow Observatory; Waveform lidar; Drylands; Plant functional types; Random forest; Machine learning; Feature selection; Ensemble; Carbon; TREE SPECIES CLASSIFICATION; EARTH SYSTEM MODELS; FOREST CARBON; AIRBORNE LIDAR; VEGETATION; CANOPY; NORMALIZATION; SENSITIVITY; CALIBRATION; INVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.070
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate classification of plant functional types (PFTs) reduces the uncertainty in global biomass and carbon estimates. Airborne small-footprint waveform lidar data are increasingly used for vegetation classification and above-ground carbon estimates at a range of spatial scales in woody or homogeneous grass and savanna ecosystems. However, a gap remains in understanding how waveform features represent and ultimately can be used to constrain the PFTs in heterogeneous semi-arid ecosystems. This study evaluates lidar waveform features and classification performance of six major PFTs, including shrubs and trees, along with bare ground in the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, USA. Waveform lidar data were obtained with the NASA Airborne Snow Observatory (ASO). From these data we derived waveform features at two spatial scales (1 m and 10 m rasters) by applying a Gaussian decomposition and a frequency-domain deconvolution. An ensemble random forest algorithm was used to assess classification performance and to select the most important waveform features. Classification models developed with the 10 m waveform features outperformed those at 1 m (Kappa (kappa) = 0.81-0.86 vs. 0.60-0.70, respectively). At 1 m resolution, lidar height features improved the PFT classification accuracy by 10% compared to the analysis without these features. However, at 10 m resolution, the inclusion of lidar derived heights with other waveform features decreased the PFT classification performance by 4%. Pulse width, rise time, percent energy, differential target cross section, and radiometrically calibrated backscatter coefficient were the most important waveform features at both spatial scales. A significant finding is that bare ground was clearly differentiated from shrubs using pulse width. Though the overall accuracy ranges between 0.72 and 0.89 across spatial scales, the two shrub PFTs showed 0.45-0.87 individual classification success at 1 m, while bare ground and tree PFTs showed high (0.72-1.0) classification accuracy at 10 m. We conclude that small-footprint waveform features can be used to characterize the heterogeneous vegetation in this and similar semi-arid ecosystems at high spatial resolution. Furthermore, waveform features such as pulse width can be used to constrain the uncertainty of terrain modeling in environments where vegetation and bare ground lidar returns are close in time and space. The dependency on spatial resolution plays a critical role in classification performance in tree-shrub co-dominant ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 509
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]   Errors in LiDAR-derived shrub height and crown area on sloped terrain [J].
Glenn, N. F. ;
Spaete, L. P. ;
Sankey, T. T. ;
Derryberry, D. R. ;
Hardegree, S. P. ;
Mitchell, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2011, 75 (04) :377-382
[22]   Waveform lidar over vegetation: An evaluation of inversion methods for estimating return energy [J].
Hancock, Steven ;
Armston, John ;
Li, Zhan ;
Gaulton, Rachel ;
Lewis, Philip ;
Disney, Mathias ;
Danson, F. Mark ;
Strahler, Alan ;
Schaaf, Crystal ;
Anderson, Karen ;
Gaston, Kevin J. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 164 :208-224
[23]   A threshold insensitive method for locating the forest canopy top with waveform lidar [J].
Hancock, Steven ;
Disney, Mathias ;
Muller, Jan-Peter ;
Lewis, Philip ;
Foster, Mike .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (12) :3286-3297
[24]   Uncertainty in plant functional type distributions and its impact on land surface models [J].
Hartley, A. J. ;
MacBean, N. ;
Georgievski, G. ;
Bontemps, S. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 203 :71-89
[25]  
Hassebo Y., 2012, REMOTE SENSING ADV T
[26]   Exploring full-waveform LiDAR parameters for tree species classification [J].
Heinzel, Johannes ;
Koch, Barbara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2011, 13 (01) :152-160
[27]   Correction of laser scanning intensity data:: Data and model-driven approaches [J].
Hoefle, Bernhard ;
Pfeifer, Norbert .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 62 (06) :415-433
[28]   Roughness Mapping on Various Vertical Scales Based on Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data [J].
Hollaus, Markus ;
Aubrecht, Christoph ;
Hoefle, Bernhard ;
Steinnocher, Klaus ;
Wagner, Wolfgang .
REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 3 (03) :503-523
[29]   Hybrid three-phase estimators for large-area forest inventory using ground plots, airborne lidar, and space lidar [J].
Holm, Soren ;
Nelson, Ross ;
Stahl, Goran .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 197 :85-97
[30]   Vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground elevation and canopy height estimates in a boreal wetland environment [J].
Hopkinson, Chris ;
Chasmer, Laura E. ;
Sass, Gabor ;
Creed, Irena F. ;
Sitar, Michael ;
Kalbfleisch, William ;
Treitz, Paul .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 31 (02) :191-206