Analysis of free modeling predictions by RBO aleph in CASP11

被引:6
作者
Mabrouk, Mahmoud [1 ]
Werner, Tim [1 ]
Schneider, Michael [1 ]
Putz, Ines [1 ]
Brock, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Robot & Biol Lab, Marchstr 23, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CASP; free modeling; ab initio structure prediction; conformational space search; contact prediction; structure prediction pipeline; PROTEIN-STRUCTURE PREDICTION; CONTACT; RECOGNITION; MULTICOM; QUALITY; SERVER;
D O I
10.1002/prot.24950
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The CASP experiment is a biannual benchmark for assessing protein structure prediction methods. In CASP11, RBO Aleph ranked as one of the top-performing automated servers in the free modeling category. This category consists of targets for which structural templates are not easily retrievable. We analyze the performance of RBO Aleph and show that its success in CASP was a result of its ab initio structure prediction protocol. A detailed analysis of this protocol demonstrates that two components unique to our method greatly contributed to prediction quality: residue-residue contact prediction by EPC-map and contact-guided conformational space search by model-based search (MBS). Interestingly, our analysis also points to a possible fundamental problem in evaluating the performance of protein structure prediction methods: Improvements in components of the method do not necessarily lead to improvements of the entire method. This points to the fact that these components interact in ways that are poorly understood. This problem, if indeed true, represents a significant obstacle to community-wide progress. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 104
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Learning generative models for protein fold families [J].
Balakrishnan, Sivaraman ;
Kamisetty, Hetunandan ;
Carbonell, Jaime G. ;
Lee, Su-In ;
Langmead, Christopher James .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 79 (04) :1061-1078
[2]   Durandal: Fast exact clustering of protein decoys [J].
Berenger, Francois ;
Shrestha, Rojan ;
Zhou, Yong ;
Simoncini, David ;
Zhang, Kam Y. J. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 33 (04) :471-474
[3]  
Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5
[4]   Guiding conformation space search with an all-atom energy potential [J].
Brunette, T. J. ;
Brock, Oliver .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 73 (04) :958-972
[5]   DOMpro: Protein domain prediction using profiles, secondary structure, relative solvent accessibility, and recursive neural networks [J].
Cheng, Jianlin ;
Sweredoski, Michael J. ;
Baldi, Pierre .
DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2006, 13 (01) :1-10
[6]   The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction [J].
Cheng, Jianlin ;
Li, Jilong ;
Wang, Zheng ;
Eickholt, Jesse ;
Deng, Xin .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 13
[7]   From Levinthal to pathways to funnels [J].
Dill, KA ;
Chan, HS .
NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (01) :10-19
[8]   Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred [J].
Hildebrand, Andrea ;
Remmert, Michael ;
Biegert, Andreas ;
Soeding, Johannes .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 77 :128-132
[9]   RosettaRemodel: A Generalized Framework for Flexible Backbone Protein Design [J].
Huang, Po-Ssu ;
Ban, Yih-En Andrew ;
Richter, Florian ;
Andre, Ingemar ;
Vernon, Robert ;
Schief, William R. ;
Baker, David .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08)
[10]   MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins [J].
Jones, David T. ;
Singh, Tanya ;
Kosciolek, Tomasz ;
Tetchner, Stuart .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 31 (07) :999-1006