Symptoms of immediate chlorhexidine hypersensitivity in patients with a positive prick test

被引:26
作者
Aalto-Korte, Kristiina
Makinen-Kiljunen, Soili
机构
[1] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Control Hypersensitiv Dis Team, FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Div Allergol, FI-00023 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Skin & Allergy Hosp, FI-00023 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
anaphylaxis; contact urticaria; ImmunoCAP (TM); immunospot; open application test; prick test; specific IgE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00900.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
There are numerous reports of anaphylaxis from chlorhexidine in surgical operations and other medical procedures, usually due to its application to wounds or mucous membranes. We wanted to analyse the clinical data of patients with a positive chlorhexidine prick test and perform some additional testing. We studied the case records of the patients with a positive chlorhexidine prick test and performed an open application test and tests for specific IgE. We found 33 patients with a positive prick test. 10 of them had had severe symptoms from chlorhexidine, and 11 had had only mild local symptoms. The size of the prick test reaction was mainly in line with the strength of the severest symptoms. Small 3- to 4-mm reactions were usually without obvious clinical relevance. Specific IgE could be demonstrated in 6 patients out of 14 tested by the ImmunoCAP (TM) method. Besides severe attacks, patients with a positive prick test often have milder local symptoms, such as exacerbation of dermatitis. Local symptoms from chlorhexidine-containing products may precede severe attacks. We recommend a prick test to be performed routinely when symptoms during medical interventional procedures, e.g. local and general anaesthesia, are investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 177
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   DELAYED AND IMMEDIATE-TYPE HYPERSENSITIVITY TO CHLORHEXIDINE [J].
BERGQVISTKARLSSON, A .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1988, 18 (02) :84-88
[2]  
Goon Anthony T J, 2004, Dermatitis, V15, P45, DOI 10.2310/6620.2004.20438
[3]  
Heinemann C., 2002, EXOG DERMATOL, V1, P186, DOI 10.1159/000066145
[4]   A revised nomenclature for allergy -: An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force [J].
Johansson, SGO ;
Hourihane, JO ;
Bousquet, J ;
Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C ;
Dreborg, S ;
Haahtela, T ;
Kowalski, ML ;
Mygind, N ;
Ring, J ;
van Cauwenberge, P ;
van Hage-Hamsten, M ;
Wüthrich, B .
ALLERGY, 2001, 56 (09) :813-824
[5]   Anaphylaxis: A review of causes and mechanisms [J].
Kemp, SF ;
Lockey, RF .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 110 (03) :341-348
[6]   Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: case report and review of the literature [J].
Krautheim, AB ;
Jermann, THM ;
Bircher, AJ .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2004, 50 (03) :113-116
[7]   THE INCIDENCE OF IGE AND IGG ANTIBODIES TO CHLORHEXIDINE [J].
LAYTON, GT ;
STANWORTH, DR ;
AMOS, HE .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1989, 19 (03) :307-314
[9]   HISTAMINE-RELEASE IN CONTACT URTICARIA [J].
NISHIOKA, K ;
DOI, T ;
KATAYAMA, I .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1984, 11 (03) :191-191
[10]   IGE ANTIBODY-MEDIATED SHOCK REACTION CAUSED BY TOPICAL APPLICATION OF CHLORHEXIDINE [J].
OHTOSHI, T ;
YAMAUCHI, N ;
TADOKORO, K ;
MIYACHI, S ;
SUZUKI, S ;
MIYAMOTO, T ;
MURANAKA, M .
CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1986, 16 (02) :155-161