Long-term outcomes of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) for prostate cancer confined to the pelvis: a single center retrospective analysis

被引:5
作者
Yao, Lihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shou, Jianzhong [2 ,4 ]
Wang, Shulian [1 ,2 ]
Song, Yongwen [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Ningning [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Yuan [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Shunan [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Jing, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Zihao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yexiong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yueping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci CAMS, Dept Radiat Oncol, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll PUMC, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Beijing Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Beijing 100006, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci CAMS, Dept Urol, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Moderate hypofractionation; Long-term outcomes; Treatment toxicities; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NON-INFERIORITY; TOXICITY; MEN; MORTALITY; EFFICACY; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-020-01679-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background There is an increasing application of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. We presented our outcomes and treatment-related toxicities with moderately hypofractionated (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) radiotherapy for a group of advanced prostate cancer patients from China. Methods From November 2006 to December 2018, 246 consecutive patients with prostate cancer confined to the pelvis were treated with moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions). 97.6% of the patients received a different duration of androgen deprivation therapy. Failure-free survival (FFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative grade >= 2 late toxicity were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier actuarial method. Prognostic factors for FFS, PCSS, and OS were analyzed. Results The median follow-up time was 74 months (range: 6-150 months). For all patients, the 5- and 10-year FFS rates were 80.0% (95% CI: 74.7-85.7%) and 63.5% (95% CI 55.4-72.8%). The failure rates for the intermediate, high-risk, locally advanced, and N1 groups were 6.1%, 13.0%, 18.4%, and 35.7%, respectively (P = 0.003). Overall, 5- and 10-year PCSS rates were 95.7% (95% CI 93.0-98.5%) and 88.2% (95% CI 82.8-93.8%). Prostate cancer-specific mortality rates for the high-risk, locally advanced, and N1 groups were 4.0%, 8.2%, and 23.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall, 5- and 10-year actuarial OS rates were 92.4% (95% CI 88.8-96.1%) and 72.7% (95% CI 64.8-81.5%). High level prostate-specific antigen and positive N stage were significantly associated with worse FFS (P < 0.05). Advanced T stage and positive N stage emerged as worse predictors of PCSS (P < 0.05). Advanced age, T stage, and positive N stage were the only factors that were significantly associated with worse OS (P < 0.05). The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of grade >= 2 late GU and GI toxicity was 17.8% (95% CI 12.5-22.7%) and 23.4% (95% CI 17.7-28.7%), respectively. Conclusions Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) for this predominantly high-risk, locally advanced, or N1 in Chinese patients demonstrates encouraging long-term outcomes and acceptable toxicity. This fractionation schedule deserves further evaluation in similar populations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [11] Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
    Dearnaley, David
    Syndikus, Isabel
    Mossop, Helen
    Khoo, Vincent
    Birtle, Alison
    Bloomfield, David
    Graham, John
    Kirkbride, Peter
    Logue, John
    Malik, Zafar
    Money-Kyrle, Julian
    O'Sullivan, Joe M.
    Panades, Miguel
    Parker, Chris
    Patterson, Helen
    Scrase, Christopher
    Staffurth, John
    Stockdale, Andrew
    Tremlett, Jean
    Bidmead, Margaret
    Mayles, Helen
    Naismith, Olivia
    South, Chris
    Gao, Annie
    Cruickshank, Clare
    Hassan, Shama
    Pugh, Julia
    Griffin, Clare
    Hall, Emma
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08) : 1047 - 1060
  • [12] Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost by helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer: monoinstitutional report of acute tolerability assessment with different toxicity scales
    Ferrera, Giuseppe
    Mortellaro, Gianluca
    Mannino, Mariella
    Caminiti, Giovanni
    Spera, Antonio
    Figlia, Vanessa
    Iacoviello, Giuseppina
    Di Paola, Gioacchino
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Lo Casto, Antonio
    Alongi, Filippo
    Pappalardo, Maria Pia
    Lagalla, Roberto
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (12): : 1170 - 1176
  • [13] The radiobiology of prostate cancer including new aspects of fractionatedradiotherapy
    Fowler, JF
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (03) : 265 - 276
  • [14] Four-Year Outcomes From a Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial of Moderately Hypofractionated Proton Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Grewal, Amardeep S.
    Schonewolf, Caitlin
    Min, Eun Jeong
    Chao, Hann-Hsiang
    Both, Stefan
    Lam, Sarah
    Mazzoni, Susan
    Bekelman, Justin
    Christodouleas, John
    Vapiwala, Neha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (04): : 713 - 722
  • [15] Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial
    Incrocci, Luca
    Wortel, Ruud C.
    Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Ghidey
    Aluwini, Shafak
    Schimmel, Erik
    Krol, Stijn
    van der Toorn, Peter-Paul
    de Jager, Hanja
    Heemsbergen, Wilma
    Heijmen, Ben
    Pos, Floris
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08) : 1061 - 1069
  • [16] The linear-quadratic model is inappropriate to model high dose per fraction effects in radiosurgery
    Kirkpatrick, John P.
    Meyer, Jeffrey J.
    Marks, Lawrence B.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) : 240 - 243
  • [17] Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Lee, W. Robert
    Dignam, James J.
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Bruner, Deborah W.
    Low, Daniel
    Swanson, Gregory P.
    Shah, Amit B.
    D'Souza, David P.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Dayes, Ian S.
    Seaward, Samantha A.
    Hall, William A.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Faria, Sergio L.
    Chen, Yuhchyau
    Koontz, Bridget F.
    Paulus, Rebecca
    Sandler, Howard M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (20) : 2325 - U39
  • [18] Trends and age-period-cohort effect on incidence and mortality of prostate cancer from 1990 to 2017 in China
    Liu, X.
    Yu, C.
    Bi, Y.
    Zhang, Z. J.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 172 : 70 - 80
  • [19] Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer confined to the pelvis: analysis of efficacy and late toxicity
    Liu, Yue-Ping
    Gray, Phillip J.
    Jin, Jing
    Wang, Wei-Hu
    Fang, Hui
    Wang, Shu-Lian
    Song, Yong-Wen
    Ren, Hua
    Liu, Xin-Fan
    Yu, Zi-Hao
    Dai, Jian-Rong
    Li, Ye-Xiong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 4 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [20] Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial
    Martin, Richard M.
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Turner, Emma L.
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Young, Grace J.
    Walsh, Eleanor I.
    Lane, J. Athene
    Noble, Sian
    Oliver, Steven E.
    Evans, Simon
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    Holding, Peter
    Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
    Brindle, Peter
    Williams, Naomi J.
    Hill, Elizabeth M.
    Ng, Siaw Yein
    Toole, Jessica
    Tazewell, Marta K.
    Hughes, Laura J.
    Davies, Charlotte F.
    Thorn, Joanna C.
    Down, Elizabeth
    Smith, George Davey
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (09): : 883 - 895