Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG Uptake in Gastric, Duodenal, and Colorectal Cancers

被引:226
作者
Pang, Yizhen [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Liang [3 ]
Luo, Zuoming [1 ,2 ]
Hao, Bing [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Hua [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Qin [3 ]
Sun, Long [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Haojun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Nucl Med, Xiamen Canc Ctr, 55 Zhenhai Rd, Xiamen 361003, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Minnan PET Ctr, Xiamen Canc Ctr, 55 Zhenhai Rd, Xiamen 361003, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, Xiamen Canc Ctr, 55 Zhenhai Rd, Xiamen 361003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PET; METASTASIS; RESECTION; NODE;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2020203275
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate clinical staging is crucial to managing gastrointestinal cancer, but fluorine 18 (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT has limitations. Targeting fibroblast-activation protein is a newer diagnostic approach for the visualization of tumor stroma, and gallium 68 (Ga-68)-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs), hereafter Ga-68-FAPIs, present a promising alternative to F-18-FDG. Purpose: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastrointestinal malignancies with that of F-18-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods: Images from patients with gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers who underwent contemporaneous F-18-FDG and Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT between October 2019 through June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. F-18-FDG and Ga-68-FAPI uptakes were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed- rank test. The McNemar test was used to compare the diagnostic performance between the two techniques. Results: Thirty-five patients (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 53-68 years]; 18 men) were evaluated. In treatment-naive patients (n = 19), Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT led to upstaging of the clinical TNM stage in four (21%) patients compared with F-18-FDG PET/CT. Tracer uptake was higher with Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT than with F-18-FDG PET/CT in primary lesions (gastric cancer: 12.7 vs 3.7, respectively, P =.003; colorectal cancer: 15.9 vs 7.9, P =.03), involved lymph nodes (6.7 vs 2.4, P<.001), and bone and visceral metastases (liver metastases: 9.7 vs 5.2, P<.001; peritoneal metastases: 8.4 vs 3.6, P<.001; bone metastases: 4.3 vs 2.2, P<.001; lung metastases: 4.4 vs 1.9, P =.01). In addition, the sensitivity of Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT was higher than that of F-18-FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary tumors (100% [19 of 19] vs 53% [10 of 19], respectively; P =.004), lymph nodes (79% [22 of 28] vs 54% [15 of 28], P<.001), and bone and visceral metastases (89% [31 of 35] vs 57% [20 of 35], P<.001). Conclusion: Gallium 68 fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor PET/CT was superior to fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers, with higher tracer uptake in most primary and metastatic lesions. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 402
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Clinical impact of FDG PET/CT in alimentary tract malignancies: an updated review [J].
Akin, Esma A. ;
Qazi, Zain N. ;
Osman, Murat ;
Zeman, Robert K. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (04) :1018-1035
[2]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[3]   Usefulness of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients presenting with inconclusive [18F]FDG PET/CT findings [J].
Chen, Haojun ;
Zhao, Liang ;
Ruan, Dan ;
Pang, Yizhen ;
Hao, Bing ;
Dai, Yaqing ;
Wu, Xiurong ;
Guo, Wei ;
Fan, Chunlei ;
Wu, Jingxun ;
Huang, Weipeng ;
Lin, Qin ;
Sun, Long ;
Wu, Hua .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (01) :73-86
[4]   Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F] FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer [J].
Chen, Haojun ;
Pang, Yizhen ;
Wu, Jingxun ;
Zhao, Liang ;
Hao, Bing ;
Wu, Jing ;
Wei, Jihong ;
Wu, Siming ;
Zhao, Long ;
Luo, Zuoming ;
Lin, Xuehua ;
Xie, Chengrong ;
Sun, Long ;
Lin, Qin ;
Wu, Hua .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (08) :1820-1832
[5]   Lymph Nodes and Gastric Cancer [J].
Coburn, Natalie G. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 99 (04) :199-206
[6]   Peritoneal carcinomatosis [J].
Coccolini, Federico ;
Gheza, Federico ;
Lotti, Marco ;
Virzi, Salvatore ;
Iusco, Domenico ;
Ghermandi, Claudio ;
Melotti, Rita ;
Baiocchi, Gianluca ;
Giulini, Stefano Maria ;
Ansaloni, Luca ;
Catena, Fausto .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (41) :6979-6994
[7]   FDG-PET has no definite role in preoperative imaging in gastric cancer [J].
Dassen, A. E. ;
Lips, D. J. ;
Hoekstra, C. J. ;
Pruijt, J. F. M. ;
Bosscha, K. .
EJSO, 2009, 35 (05) :449-455
[8]   Gastrointestinal tract malignancies and positron emission tomography: An overview [J].
Esteves, FP ;
Schuster, DM ;
Halkar, RK .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (02) :169-181
[9]   Routinely staging gastric cancer with 18F-FDG PET-CT detects additional metastases and predicts early recurrence and death after surgery [J].
Findlay, John M. ;
Antonowicz, Stefan ;
Segaran, Ashvina ;
el Kafsi, Jihene ;
Zhang, Alexa ;
Bradley, Kevin M. ;
Gillies, Richard S. ;
Maynard, Nicholas D. ;
Middleton, Mark R. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05) :2490-2498
[10]   68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers [J].
Giesel, Frederik L. ;
Kratochwil, Clemens ;
Lindner, Thomas ;
Marschalek, Manfred M. ;
Loktev, Anastasia ;
Lehnert, Wencke ;
Debus, Juergen ;
Jaeger, Dirk ;
Flechsig, Paul ;
Altmann, Annette ;
Mier, Walter ;
Haberkorn, Uwe .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60 (03) :386-392