Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in a National, Privately Insured Population: Utilization, Expenditures, and Price Trends

被引:0
作者
Atzinger, Christopher B. [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Jeff J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Pharm, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Pharmerit Int, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Pharm, Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; drug utilization; expenditures; out-of-pocket cost; price trends; rheumatoid arthritis; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PATIENTS; MEDICARE PART D; UNITED-STATES; SPECIALTY DRUGS; IMPACT; COSTS; ETANERCEPT; INFLIXIMAB; ADALIMUMAB; BURDEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spending on biologic drugs is a significant driver of drug expenditures for payers in private health plans. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are some of the most effective and costly treatments in a physician's arsenal. Understanding the total annual expenditure, the average cost per prescription, and the impact of cost-sharing is important for drug benefit managers. OBJECTIVE: To assess drug utilization, expenditures, out-of-pocket (OOP) cost, and price trends of biologic DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a large managed care organization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective database analysis of pharmacy claims data from January 2004 to December 2013 using the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database, which covers 13.3 million lives. Pharmacy claims for 40,373 patients with RA were identified during the study period. In all, 9 biologic DMARDs approved for the treatment of RA, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, certo -izumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, anakinra, abatacept, and rituximab, and 1 nonbiologic oral, small molecule-targeted synthetic drug, tofacitinib, were included in this study. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the total annual number of prescriptions, the total annual expenditures, the average annual cost per drug (a proxy of drug price), and the average OOP cost (copay plus deductible and coinsurance). All measurements were also stratified by study drugs and by insurance type. RESULTS: Of the 40,373 patients with RA included in the study, approximately 76% were female (mean age, 55 years at diagnosis). Approximately 77% of the patients were white, and almost 48% lived in the South or Midwest region of the United States. Approximately 62% of patients had a point of service insurance plan. Expenditures on biologic DMARDs increased from $ 166 million in 2004 to $ 243 million in 2013, and the number of prescriptions and refills increased from 59,960 in 2004 to 105,295 in 2013. Prescriptions for biologic DMARDs increased more than 20% per patient from 2004 to 2013. The average cost per prescription remained relatively unchanged, at approximately $ 2300 per prescription, but the OOP expenditures increased from $ 36 (2.5%) per prescription to $ 128 (7%) during the study period. The OOP expenditures increased the most in HMO plans and in plans categorized as other (284% and 388%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Spending on biologic DMARDs has been primarily driven by an increase in prescribing rates, as the average amount reimbursed per prescription remained relatively unchanged over time, despite a regular annual increase to the average wholesale acquisition cost of 2% to 10%. The OOP burden for patients has increased, but this does not appear to have limited the use of biologic DMARDs. The entrance of new biologic and nonbiologic DMARDs into the market in the past few years is eroding the market share for several established drugs, and may lead to different results, warranting a study of new trends.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, based on the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria: A systematic review
    Alamanos, Yannis
    Voulgari, Paraskevi V.
    Drosos, Alexandros A.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 36 (03) : 182 - 188
  • [2] Changes in Utilization and Costs for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, 1997 to 2006
    Birnbaum, Howard G.
    Pike, Crystal
    Banerjee, Ritesh
    Waldman, Tracy
    Cifaldi, Mary
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2012, 30 (04) : 323 - 336
  • [3] Cost per Treated Patient for Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Infliximab Across Adult Indications: a Claims Analysis
    Bonafede, Machaon M. K.
    Gandra, Shravanthi R.
    Watson, Crystal
    Princic, Nicole
    Fox, Kathleen M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2012, 29 (03) : 234 - 248
  • [4] Factors Associated With the Initiation of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Claims Database Study
    Bonafede, Machaon M. K.
    Fox, Kathleen M.
    Johnson, Barbara H.
    Watson, Crystal
    Gandra, Shravanthi R.
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 34 (02) : 457 - 467
  • [5] Trends in RA patients' adherence to subcutaneous anti-TNF therapies and costs
    Borah, Bijan J.
    Huang, Xingyue
    Zarotsky, Victoria
    Globe, Denise
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (06) : 1365 - 1377
  • [6] Carter Chureen T, 2012, J Med Econ, V15, P332, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2011.649325
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, RHEUM ARTHR RA
  • [8] Impact of medicare part D for medicare-age adults with arthritis: Prescription use, prescription expenditures, and medical spending from 2005 to 2008
    Cheng, Lung-I
    Rascati, Karen L.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (09) : 1423 - 1429
  • [9] A systematic review of validated methods for identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis using administrative or claims data
    Chung, Cecilia P.
    Rohan, Patricia
    Krishnaswami, Shanthi
    McPheeters, Melissa L.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2013, 31 : K41 - K61
  • [10] Impact of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 on Utilization and Spending for Medicare Part B-Covered Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Doshi, Jalpa A.
    Li, Pengxiang
    Puig, Andrea
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2010, 62 (03) : 354 - 361