Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services

被引:86
作者
Snall, Tord [1 ]
Lehtomaki, Joona [2 ]
Arponen, Anni [2 ]
Elith, Jane [3 ]
Moilanen, Atte [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Swedish Species Informat Ctr, PO 7007, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biosci, Viikinkaari 1,POB 65, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Green infrastructure; Corridor; Spatial conservation prioritization; Systematic conservation planning; Zonation software; Ecosystem services; Citizen science data; BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONNECTIVITY; CORRIDORS; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-015-0613-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is high-level political support for the use of green infrastructure (GI) across Europe, to maintain viable populations and to provide ecosystem services (ES). Even though GI is inherently a spatial concept, the modern tools for spatial planning have not been recognized, such as in the recent European Environment Agency (EEA) report. We outline a toolbox of methods useful for GI design that explicitly accounts for biodiversity and ES. Data on species occurrence, habitats, and environmental variables are increasingly available via open-access internet platforms. Such data can be synthesized by statistical species distribution modeling, producing maps of biodiversity features. These, together with maps of ES, can form the basis for GI design. We argue that spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) methods are effective tools for GI design, as the overall SCP goal is cost-effective allocation of conservation efforts. Corridors are currently promoted by the EEA as the means for implementing GI design, but they typically target the needs of only a subset of the regional species pool. SCP methods would help to ensure that GI provides a balanced solution for the requirements of many biodiversity features (e.g., species, habitat types) and ES simultaneously in a cost-effective manner. Such tools are necessary to make GI into an operational concept for combating biodiversity loss and promoting ES.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 256
页数:6
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural-urban gradient [J].
Andersson, Kjell ;
Angelstam, Per ;
Elbakidze, Marine ;
Axelsson, Robert ;
Degerman, Erik .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2013, 28 (02) :143-165
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION
[3]   A successful community-level strategy for conservation prioritization [J].
Arponen, Anni ;
Moilanen, Atte ;
Ferrier, Simon .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2008, 45 (05) :1436-1445
[4]  
Ball I.R., 2000, MARXAN (V1.8.2): Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing
[5]   Toward Best Practices for Developing Regional Connectivity Maps [J].
Beier, Paul ;
Spencer, Wayne ;
Baldwin, Robert F. ;
McRae, Brad H. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (05) :879-892
[6]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[7]   Integrating Climate Change into Habitat Conservation Plans Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act [J].
Bernazzani, Paola ;
Bradley, Bethany A. ;
Opperman, Jeffrey J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 49 (06) :1103-1114
[8]   Use of Linkage Mapping and Centrality Analysis Across Habitat Gradients to Conserve Connectivity of Gray Wolf Populations in Western North America [J].
Carroll, Carlos ;
McRae, Brad H. ;
Brookes, Allen .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (01) :78-87
[9]   Conservation planning for ecosystem services [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Shaw, M. Rebecca ;
Cameron, David R. ;
Underwood, Emma C. ;
Daily, Gretchen C. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (11) :2138-2152
[10]   Ecosystem Services in Conservation Planning: Targeted Benefits vs. Co-Benefits or Costs? [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Hoshizaki, Lara ;
Klinkenberg, Brian .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09)