Sacral nerve stimulation: a promising therapy for fecal and urinary incontinence and constipation in children

被引:46
|
作者
Sulkowski, Jason P. [1 ,2 ]
Nacion, Kristine M. [1 ]
Deans, Katherine J. [1 ,2 ]
Minneci, Peter C. [1 ,2 ]
Levitt, Marc A. [2 ]
Mousa, Hayat M. [2 ,3 ]
Alpert, Seth A. [2 ,4 ]
Teich, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Res Inst, Ctr Surg Outcomes Res, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Surg, Dept Surg, Ctr Colorectal & Pelv Reconstruct, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Urol, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Dysfunctional elimination syndrome; Sacral nerve stimulation; Constipation; Fecal incontinence; Fecal soiling; Anorectal malformation; DYSFUNCTIONAL ELIMINATION SYNDROME; IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NEUROMODULATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.043
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study describes our series of children with bowel and bladder dysfunction (BDD) treated with sacral nerve stimulation in order to begin to identify characteristics associated with better outcomes and guide future therapies. Methods: Between May 2012 and February 2014, 29 patients were evaluated before and after sacral nerve stimulator (SNS) placement. A prospective data registry was developed that contains clinical information and patient-reported measures: Fecal Incontinence Qualify of Life Scale, Fecal Incontinence Severity Scale, PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale, and Vancouver DES Symptom Scale. Results: The median age of patients was 12.1 (interquartile range: 9.4, 14.3) years and the median follow-up period was 17.7 (12.9, 36.4) weeks. 93% had GI complaints and 65.5% had urinary symptoms while 7% had urologic symptoms only. The most common etiologies of BBD were idiopathic (66%) and imperforate anus (27%). Five patients required reoperation due to a complication with battery placement. Six of 11 patients (55%) with a pre-SNS cecostomy tube no longer require an antegrade bowel regimen as they now have voluntary bowel movements. Ten of eleven patients (91%) no longer require anticholinergic medications for bladder overactivity after receiving SNS. Significant improvements have been demonstrated in all four patient-reported instruments for the overall cohort. Conclusions: Early results have demonstrated improvements in both GI and urinary function after SNS placement in pediatric patients with bowel and bladder dysfunction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1644 / 1647
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation
    Jarrett, MED
    Mowatt, G
    Glazener, CMA
    Fraser, C
    Nicholls, RJ
    Grant, AM
    Kamm, MA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (12) : 1559 - 1569
  • [32] Postoperative Issues of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Systematic Literature Review and Treatment Guideline
    Maeda, Yasuko
    Matzel, Klaus
    Lundby, Lilli
    Buntzen, Steen
    Laurberg, Soren
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (11) : 1443 - 1460
  • [33] Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Female Fecal and Urinary Incontinence in Patients over age 70
    Rustia, G.
    Baracy Jr, M.
    Baker, N.
    Aslam, M. F.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S319 - S320
  • [34] The Effects of Sacral Nerve Stimulation on Fecal/Urinary Incontinence are Maintained After Switching the Stimulator off
    Giannini, Ivana
    Giuratrabocchetta, Simona
    Tondo, Mirna
    Digennaro, Rosa
    Rinaldi, Marcella
    Altomare, Donato F.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S804 - S804
  • [35] Long-term Durability of Sacral Nerve Stimulation Therapy for chronic Fecal Incontinence
    Schwandner, O.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 36 (04) : 268 - 269
  • [36] Long-term Durability of Sacral Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Chronic Fecal Incontinence
    Hull, Tracy
    Giese, Chad
    Wexner, Steven D.
    Mellgren, Anders
    Devroede, Ghislain
    Madoff, Robert D.
    Stromberg, Katherine
    Coller, John A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (02) : 234 - 245
  • [37] Newer Concepts in Fecal Incontinence: Injectables and Sacral Nerve Stimulation
    Shawki, Sherief
    Wexner, Steven D.
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2010, 21 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [38] Six Years of Experience With Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence
    Michelsen, Hanne B.
    Thompson-Fawcett, Mark
    Lundby, Lilli
    Krogh, Klaus
    Laurberg, Soren
    Buntzen, Steen
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (04) : 414 - 421
  • [39] Aspect of fecal incontinence improved by sacral nerve stimulation (SNS)
    Douglas, L.
    Cattle, K.
    Kiff, E.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 686 - 686
  • [40] Efficacy of sacral-nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence
    Caroline Barranco
    Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2006, 3 (1): : 9 - 9