Oncologic Trends, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Locoregional Recurrence: An Analysis of Tumor-to-Nipple Distance and Critical Factors in Therapeutic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

被引:38
作者
Frey, Jordan D.
Salibian, Ara A.
Lee, Jiyon
Harris, Kristin
Axelrod, Deborah M.
Guth, Amber A.
Shapiro, Richard L.
Schnabel, Freya R.
Karp, Nolan S.
Choi, Mihye
机构
[1] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Hansjorg Wyss Dept Plast Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[3] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
COMPLEX NAC INVOLVEMENT; PREOPERATIVE BREAST MRI; RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER; SAFETY; COMPLICATIONS; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000005600
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Oncologic outcomes with nipple-sparing mastectomy continue to be established. The authors examine oncologic trends, outcomes, and risk factors, including tumor-to-nipple distance, in therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomies. Methods: Demographics, outcomes, and overall trends for all nipple-sparing mastectomies performed for a therapeutic indication from 2006 to 2017 were analyzed. Oncologic outcomes were investigated with specific focus on recurrence and associated factors, including tumor-to-nipple distance. Results: A total of 496 therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomies were performed, with an average follow-up time of 48.25 months. The most common tumor types were invasive carcinoma (52.4 percent) and ductal carcinoma in situ (50.4 percent). Sentinel lymph node sampling was performed in 79.8 percent of nipple-sparing mastectomies; 4.1 percent had positive frozen sentinel lymph node biopsy results, whereas 15.7 percent had positive nodal status on permanent pathologic examination. The most common pathologic cancer stage was stage IA (42.5 percent) followed by stage 0 (31.3 percent). The rate of local recurrence was 1.6 percent (n = 8), and the rate of regional recurrence was 0.6 percent (n = 3). In all, 171 nipple-sparing mastectomies had magnetic resonance imaging available with which to assess tumor-to-nipple distance. Tumor-to-nipple distance of 1 cm or less (25.0 percent versus 2.4 percent; p = 0.0031/p = 0.1129) and of 2 cm or less (8.7 percent versus 2.0 percent; p = 0.0218/p = 0.1345) trended to higher rates of locoregional recurrence. In univariate analysis, tumor-to-nipple distance of 1 cm or less was the only significant risk factor for recurrence (OR, 13.5833; p = 0.0385). No factors were significant in regression analysis. Conclusions: In early stage and in situ breast carcinoma, therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy appears oncologically safe, with a locoregional recurrence rate of 2.0 percent. Tumor-to-nipple distances of 1 cm or less and 2 cm or less trended to higher recurrence rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1575 / 1585
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - A Swedish matched cohort study [J].
Adam, H. ;
Bygdeson, M. ;
de Boniface, J. .
EJSO, 2014, 40 (10) :1209-1215
[2]   Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Sub-areolar Biopsy: To Freeze or not to Freeze? Evaluating the Role of Sub-areolar Intraoperative Frozen Section [J].
Alperovich, Michael ;
Choi, Mihye ;
Karp, Nolan S. ;
Singh, Baljit ;
Ayo, Diego ;
Frey, Jordan D. ;
Roses, Daniel F. ;
Schnabel, Freya R. ;
Axelrod, Deborah M. ;
Shapiro, Richard L. ;
Guth, Amber A. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (01) :18-23
[3]   Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients with Prior Breast Irradiation: Are Patients at Higher Risk for Reconstructive Complications? [J].
Alperovich, Michael ;
Choi, Mihye ;
Frey, Jordan D. ;
Lee, Z-Hye ;
Levine, Jamie P. ;
Saadeh, Pierre B. ;
Shapiro, Richard L. ;
Axelrod, Deborah M. ;
Guth, Amber A. ;
Karp, Nolan S. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (02) :202E-206E
[4]  
American Joint Committee on Cancer, 2009, AM JOINT COMM CANC 7
[5]   Quality-of-Life Outcomes Improve with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction [J].
Bailey, Christopher R. ;
Ogbuagu, Onyebuchi ;
Baltodano, Pablo A. ;
Simjee, Usamah F. ;
Manahan, Michele A. ;
Cooney, Damon S. ;
Jacobs, Lisa K. ;
Tsangaris, Theodore N. ;
Cooney, Carisa M. ;
Rosson, Gedge D. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (02) :219-226
[6]   Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: A prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients [J].
Benediktsson, K. P. ;
Perbeck, L. .
EJSO, 2008, 34 (02) :143-148
[7]   Nipple Skin-Sparing Mastectomy is Feasible for Advanced Disease [J].
Burdge, Eric C. ;
Yuen, James ;
Hardee, Matthew ;
Gadgil, Pranjali V. ;
Das, Chandan ;
Henry-Tillman, Ronda ;
Ochoa, Daniela ;
Korourian, Soheila ;
Klimberg, V. Suzanne .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (10) :3294-3302
[8]   Breast Reconstruction following Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Complications, Reconstruction Outcomes, and 5-Year Trends [J].
Colwell, Amy S. ;
Tessler, Oren ;
Lin, Alex M. ;
Liao, Eric ;
Winograd, Jonathan ;
Cetrulo, Curtis L. ;
Tang, Rong ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Austen, William G. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (03) :496-506
[9]   Primary tumor location predicts the site of local relapse after nipple-areola complex (NAC) sparing mastectomy [J].
Cont, Nicoletta Tomasi ;
Maggiorotto, Furio ;
Martincich, Laura ;
Rivolin, Alessandro ;
Kubatzki, Franziska ;
Sgandurra, Paola ;
Marocco, Francesco ;
Magistris, Alessandra ;
Gatti, Marco ;
Balmativola, Davide ;
Montemurro, Filippo ;
Sapino, Anna ;
Ponzone, Riccardo .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 165 (01) :85-95
[10]   Increasing Eligibility for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy [J].
Coopey, Suzanne B. ;
Tang, Rong ;
Lei, Lan ;
Freer, Phoebe E. ;
Kansal, Kari ;
Colwell, Amy S. ;
Gadd, Michele A. ;
Specht, Michelle C. ;
Austen, William G., Jr. ;
Smith, Barbara L. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (10) :3218-3222