Assessment of Femoral Cartilage Morphological and Topological Features Using Machine Learning

被引:0
作者
Gunnarsson, Arnar Evgeni [1 ]
Ciliberti, Federica Kiyomi [1 ]
Belfiori, Chiara [1 ]
Lindemann, Alessia [1 ]
Forni, Riccardo [1 ]
Jonsson, Halldor, Jr. [2 ]
Gargiulo, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Reykjavik Univ, Inst Biomed & Neural Engn, Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Hosp Iceland, Dept Orthoped, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METROLOGY FOR EXTENDED REALITY, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEURAL ENGINEERING (METROXRAINE) | 2022年
关键词
topology; morphology; cartilage; machine learning; feature extraction; OSTEOARTHRITIS; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1109/MetroXRAINE54828.2022.9967659
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cartilage is an important interface between bones in the human body, but is often prone to deterioration, especially within an aging population [1]. Understanding the topology and morphology mathematically can aid and ease the diagnosis of degenerative diseases, relieving stress on the health care systems by reducing time taken to diagnose. This research explores the topological and morphological features of femoral cartilage using computer-aided design (CAD) models and machine learning (ML) methods to classify degeneration experienced in patient cartilage. Features extracted are related from a three dimensional wall-thickness analysis, two dimensional thickness measurements, as well as fat and water content within the cartilage. The preliminary analysis result in abnormally accurate models for classifying degeneration, but should be taken with a grain of salt as the data-set only includes 46 patients. The accuracies range from 83 to 91%, therefore the next steps would be to expand the data-set, re-train the models and analyze the results to see the effects and the classification accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 282
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Does cartilage loss cause pain in osteoarthritis and if so, how much?
    Bacon, Kathryn
    LaValley, Michael P.
    Jafarzadeh, S. Reza
    Felson, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 (08) : 1105 - 1110
  • [2] Vital Signs: Prevalence of Doctor-Diagnosed Arthritis and Arthritis-Attributable Activity Limitation - United States, 2013-2015
    Barbour, Kamil E.
    Helmick, Charles G.
    Boring, Michael
    Brady, Teresa J.
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2017, 66 (09): : 246 - 253
  • [3] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [4] Chougule V.N., 2018, CLIN CASE STUDY SPIN
  • [5] CT- and MRI-Based 3D Reconstruction of Knee Joint to Assess Cartilage and Bone
    Ciliberti, Federica Kiyomi
    Guerrini, Lorena
    Gunnarsson, Arnar Evgeni
    Recenti, Marco
    Jacob, Deborah
    Cangiano, Vincenzo
    Tesfahunegn, Yonatan Afework
    Islind, Anna Sigriour
    Tortorella, Francesco
    Tsirilaki, Mariella
    Jonsson Jr, Halldor
    Gargiulo, Paolo
    Aubonnet, Romain
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [6] Is cartilage thickness different in young subjects with and without patellofemoral pain?
    Draper, C. E.
    Besier, T. F.
    Gold, G. E.
    Fredericson, M.
    Fiene, A.
    Beaupre, G. S.
    Delp, S. L.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2006, 14 (09) : 931 - 937
  • [7] New insight in the relationship between regional patterns of knee cartilage thickness, osteoarthritis disease severity, and gait mechanics
    Erhart-Hledik, Jennifer C.
    Favre, Julien
    Andriacchi, Thomas P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 48 (14) : 3868 - 3875
  • [8] Fan Chongyi, DECREASING THICKNESS
  • [9] Patterns of Femoral Cartilage Thickness are Different in Asymptomatic and Osteoarthritic Knees and Can be Used to Detect Disease-Related Differences Between Samples
    Favre, Julien
    Scanlan, Sean F.
    Erhart-Hledik, Jenifer C.
    Blazek, Katerina
    Andriacchi, Thomas P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2013, 135 (10):
  • [10] Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
    Friedman, JH
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2001, 29 (05) : 1189 - 1232