Developing a short-form of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale: The Genomics Outcome Scale

被引:43
作者
Grant, Peter E. [1 ]
Pampaka, Maria [2 ,3 ]
Payne, Katherine [4 ]
Clarke, Angus [5 ]
McAllister, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Med Educ, Sch Med, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Social Stat, Sch Social Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Dept Educ, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Div Canc & Genet, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
GCOS-24; GOS; Genetic counselling; Patient reported outcome measure; Item response theory; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; EMPOWERMENT; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.015
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) is a 24-item patient reported outcome measure for use in evaluations of genetic counselling and testing services. The aim of this study was to develop a short form of GCOS-24. The study comprised three phases. Phase I: Cognitive interviews were used to explore interpretability of GCOS-24 items and which GCOS-24 items were most valued by the target population. Phase II: The Graded Response Model was used to analyse an existing set of GCOS-24 responses (n = 395) to examine item discrimination. Phase III: Item Selection. Three principles guided the approach to item selection (i) Items with poor discriminative properties were not selected; (ii) To avoid redundancy, items capturing a similar outcome were not selected together; item information curves and cognitive interview findings were used to establish superior items. (iii) Rasch analysis was then used to determine the optimal scale. In Phase I, ten cognitive interviews were conducted with individuals affected by or at risk for a genetic condition, recruited from patient support groups. Analysis of interview transcripts identified twelve GCOS-24 items which were highly valued by participants. In Phase II, Graded Response Model item characteristic curves and item information curves were produced. In Phase III, findings from Phases I and II were used to select ten highly-valued items that perform well. Finally, items were iteratively removed and permutated to establish optimal fit statistics under the Rasch model. A six-item questionnaire with a five-point Likert Scale was produced (The Genomics Outcome Scale (GOS)). Correlation between GCOS-24 and GOS scores is high (r = 0.838 at 99% confidence), suggesting that GOS maintains the ability of GCOS-24 to capture empowerment, whilst providing a less burdensome scale for respondents. This study represents the first step in developing a preference-based measure which could be used in the evaluation of technologies and services used in genomic medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 334
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative
    Alonso, Jordi
    Bartlett, Susan J.
    Rose, Matthias
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Chaplin, John E.
    Efficace, Fabio
    Leplege, Alain
    Lu, Aiping
    Tulsky, David S.
    Raat, Hein
    Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike
    Revicki, Dennis
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Cella, David
    Forrest, Christopher B.
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [2] RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES
    ANDRICH, D
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) : 561 - 573
  • [3] Rasch analysis of the Antimicrobial Self-Assessment Toolkit for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts (ASAT v17)
    Bailey, Chantelle
    Tully, Mary P.
    Pampaka, Maria
    Cooke, Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (02) : 604 - 613
  • [4] Assessment of Patient Empowerment - A Systematic Review of Measures
    Barr, Paul J.
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Bravo, Paulina
    Faber, Marjan J.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    McAllister, Marion
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [5] Bernhardt BA, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V94, P189, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20000918)94:3<189::AID-AJMG3>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-E
  • [7] Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT™) to the metric of traditional headache scales
    Bjorner, JB
    Kosinski, M
    Ware, JE
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (08) : 981 - 1002
  • [8] Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
    Bravo, Paulina
    Edwards, Adrian
    Barr, Paul James
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Elwyn, Glyn
    McAllister, Marion
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [9] The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years
    Cella, David
    Yount, Susan
    Rothrock, Nan
    Gershon, Richard
    Cook, Karon
    Reeve, Bryce
    Ader, Deborah
    Fries, James F.
    Bruce, Bonnie
    Rose, Mattias
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) : S3 - S11
  • [10] Clarke A, 1996, CLIN GENET, V50, P462