Pupil Perimetry Demonstrates Hemifield Pupillary Hypokinesia in a Patient With a Pretectal Lesion Causing a Relative Afferent Pupil Defect but No Visual Field Loss

被引:10
作者
Papageorgiou, Eleni [1 ]
Wermund, Thomas [2 ]
Wilhelm, Helmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Ctr Ophthalmol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Helios Kliniken Schwerin, Dept Ophthalmol, Schwerin, Germany
关键词
NORMAL VISION; PATHWAY; PARESIS; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1097/WNO.0b013e318198cb8c
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lesions affecting the pretectum or the brachium of the superior colliculus (brachium) and sparing the optic tract cause a contralateral relative afferent pupil defect (RAPD) but no visual field loss, It has been assumed that the pupillomotor pathways within the brachium are a continuation of the pupillomotor pathways traveling in the optic tract. To investigate this assumption, we looked for hemihypokinesia by means of pupil perimetry. Methods: Pupillary hemifield stimulation was performed in a 65-year-old woman with normal visual fields and an isolated left RAPID due to a cerebral hemorrhage affecting the right dorsal midbrain. The pupil responses from light stimulation of the nasal inferior, nasal superior, and temporal inferior and temporal superior quadrants or both eyes were recorded using computerized binocular infrared pupillography. Each stimulus was presented 5 times and the mean amplitude of the pupil response was calculated for each stimulus location. Results: Pupil perimetry demonstrated a marked hemihypokinesia (reduced light reaction) in the hemifield contralateral to the site of the lesion. Conclusions: Our experiment suggests that the brachium is indeed a continuation of the afferent pupillary fibers traveling in the optic tract.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 36
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BEHR C, 1926, Z PRAKT AUGENHEILKD, V58, P398
[2]   Isolated relative afferent pupillary defect secondary to contralateral midbrain compression [J].
Chen, CJ ;
Scheufele, M ;
Sheth, M ;
Torabi, A ;
Hogan, N ;
Frohman, EM .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 61 (09) :1451-1453
[3]  
ELIOTT D, 1991, J CLIN NEURO-OPHTHAL, V11, P169
[4]   AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT IN PINEAL REGION TUMOR [J].
ELLIS, CJK .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1984, 47 (07) :739-741
[5]   RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT WITH NORMAL VISUAL FUNCTION [J].
FORMAN, S ;
BEHRENS, MM ;
ODEL, JG ;
SPECTOR, RT ;
HILAL, S .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 108 (08) :1074-1075
[6]   A relative afferent pupillary defect without any visual sensory deficit [J].
Girkin, CA ;
Perry, JD ;
Miller, NR .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 116 (11) :1544-1545
[7]  
JOHNSON RE, 1987, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V22, P282
[8]   Origin of the relative afferent pupillary defect in optic tract lesions [J].
Kardon, Randy ;
Kawasaki, Aki ;
Miller, Neil R. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 113 (08) :1345-1353
[9]  
KING JT, 1991, NEUROLOGY, V41, P945
[10]  
LOEWENFELD IE, 1999, PUPIL ANATOMY PHYSL, V1, P203