Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain

被引:4
作者
Lopez-Franco, Maria Dolores [1 ]
Parra-Anguita, Laura [1 ]
Comino-Sanz, Ines Maria [1 ]
Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Pedro L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Nursing, Jaen, Andalucia, Spain
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 12期
关键词
wound management; health & safety; risk management; ULCER PREVENTION; PERCEIVED BARRIERS; INTENSIVE-CARE; PREVALENCE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To develop and validate a new questionnaire to measure the nurses' perceptions of the barriers towards the prevention of pressure injuries (PIs) at hospitals. Design Validation study with mixed methods. Setting Four university hospitals in southern Spain. Participants The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. A panel of 14 wound care experts rated the content validity. A sample of 438 nurses (registered nurses and assistant nurses) participated in the survey. Main outcome measures The psychometric properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers (PIPB) questionnaire evaluated were: content validity, internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Results The final version of the questionnaire has 25 items grouped into four factors (management and organisation, motivation and priority, knowledge, and staff and collaboration). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit and error indices for the model (Comparative Fit Index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.074). Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 (overall), and 0.89 (factor 1), 0.75 (factor 2), 0.72 (factor 3) and 0.45 (factor 4). Construct validity was good, demonstrated by the expected association with the scores on patient safety culture and on considering PIs as an adverse effect of hospital stay, but not with attitude score. Conclusion The PIPB questionnaire is an instrument useful for measuring nurses' perceptions of the barriers to PIs prevention. The initial evidence shows that the questionnaire has good content validity, internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Relevance and comprehensiveness need to be assessed in further studies. It can be used both in research and in the evaluation of clinical settings to implementation of PIs preventive programmes in hospitals.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, ASS MAN PRESS INJ IN
  • [2] [Anonymous], NEV EV
  • [3] Prevalence, incidence and associated factors of pressure ulcers in home palliative care patients: A retrospective chart review
    Artico, Marco
    Dante, Angelo
    D'Angelo, Daniela
    Lamarca, Luciano
    Mastroianni, Chiara
    Petitti, Tommasangelo
    Piredda, Michela
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (01) : 299 - 307
  • [4] Avsar P, 2019, J WOUND CARE, V28, P795, DOI 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.12.795
  • [5] Reexamining the Literature on Terminal Ulcers, SCALE, Skin Failure, and Unavoidable Pressure Injuries
    Ayello, Elizabeth A.
    Levine, Jeffrey M.
    Langemo, Diane
    Kennedy-Evans, Karen Lou
    Brennan, Mary R.
    Sibbald, R. Gary
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2019, 32 (03) : 109 - 121
  • [6] Pressure ulcers: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP)
    Beeckman, D.
    Defloor, T.
    Demarre, L.
    Van Hecke, A.
    Vanderwee, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (11) : 1432 - 1441
  • [7] Beitz J M, 2001, Ostomy Wound Manage, V47, P56
  • [8] Prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcer in hospitalized adult patients; A single center study from Ethiopia
    Bereded D.T.
    Salih M.H.
    Abebe A.E.
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 11 (1)
  • [9] Practice on pressure ulcer prevention among nurses in selected public hospitals, Tigray, Ethiopia
    Berihu, Hagos
    Wubayehu, Tewolde
    Teklu, Tewolde
    Zeru, Teklay
    Gerensea, Hadgu
    [J]. BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [10] Bernardes R. M., 2016, Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, V15, P236