The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets

被引:291
作者
Hedenus, Fredrik [1 ]
Wirsenius, Stefan [1 ]
Johansson, Daniel J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Environm & Energy Dept, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; METHANE; EFFICIENCY; OPTIONS; YIELD; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-014-1104-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For agriculture, there are three major options for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: 1) productivity improvements, particularly in the livestock sector; 2) dedicated technical mitigation measures; and 3) human dietary changes. The aim of the paper is to estimate long-term agricultural GHG emissions, under different mitigation scenarios, and to relate them to the emissions space compatible with the 2 A degrees C temperature target. Our estimates include emissions up to 2070 from agricultural soils, manure management, enteric fermentation and paddy rice fields, and are based on IPCC Tier 2 methodology. We find that baseline agricultural CO2-equivalent emissions (using Global Warming Potentials with a 100 year time horizon) will be approximately 13 Gton CO(2)eq/year in 2070, compared to 7.1 Gton CO(2)eq/year 2000. However, if faster growth in livestock productivity is combined with dedicated technical mitigation measures, emissions may be kept to 7.7 Gton CO(2)eq/year in 2070. If structural changes in human diets are included, emissions may be reduced further, to 3-5 Gton CO(2)eq/year in 2070. The total annual emissions for meeting the 2 A degrees C target with a chance above 50 % is in the order of 13 Gton CO(2)eq/year or less in 2070, for all sectors combined. We conclude that reduced ruminant meat and dairy consumption will be indispensable for reaching the 2 A degrees C target with a high probability, unless unprecedented advances in technology take place.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 91
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets - The case of Denmark [J].
Edjabou, Louise Dyhr ;
Smed, Sinne .
FOOD POLICY, 2013, 39 :84-96
[12]  
Eggleston HS, 2006, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, V4
[13]  
Fan M-S, 2009, P INT PLANT NUTR C 1
[14]  
FAOSTAT, 2019, FOOD AGR ORG UN STAT
[15]   To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females [J].
Forestell, Catherine A. ;
Spaeth, Andrea M. ;
Kane, Stephanie A. .
APPETITE, 2012, 58 (01) :319-325
[16]  
Forster P., 2007, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVB.77.220407
[17]   Assessment of the methane mitigation potentials of alternative water regimes in rice fields using a process-based biogeochemistry model [J].
Fumoto, Tamon ;
Yanagihara, Tetsuji ;
Saito, Takashi ;
Yagi, Kazuyuki .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2010, 16 (06) :1847-1859
[18]  
Gerber P. J., 2013, Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities
[19]   Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? [J].
Grainger, C. ;
Beauchemin, K. A. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 :308-320
[20]   Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends [J].
Grassini, Patricio ;
Eskridge, Kent M. ;
Cassman, Kenneth G. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 4