The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets

被引:291
作者
Hedenus, Fredrik [1 ]
Wirsenius, Stefan [1 ]
Johansson, Daniel J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Environm & Energy Dept, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; METHANE; EFFICIENCY; OPTIONS; YIELD; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-014-1104-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For agriculture, there are three major options for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: 1) productivity improvements, particularly in the livestock sector; 2) dedicated technical mitigation measures; and 3) human dietary changes. The aim of the paper is to estimate long-term agricultural GHG emissions, under different mitigation scenarios, and to relate them to the emissions space compatible with the 2 A degrees C temperature target. Our estimates include emissions up to 2070 from agricultural soils, manure management, enteric fermentation and paddy rice fields, and are based on IPCC Tier 2 methodology. We find that baseline agricultural CO2-equivalent emissions (using Global Warming Potentials with a 100 year time horizon) will be approximately 13 Gton CO(2)eq/year in 2070, compared to 7.1 Gton CO(2)eq/year 2000. However, if faster growth in livestock productivity is combined with dedicated technical mitigation measures, emissions may be kept to 7.7 Gton CO(2)eq/year in 2070. If structural changes in human diets are included, emissions may be reduced further, to 3-5 Gton CO(2)eq/year in 2070. The total annual emissions for meeting the 2 A degrees C target with a chance above 50 % is in the order of 13 Gton CO(2)eq/year or less in 2070, for all sectors combined. We conclude that reduced ruminant meat and dairy consumption will be indispensable for reaching the 2 A degrees C target with a high probability, unless unprecedented advances in technology take place.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 91
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: meta-analysis [J].
Akiyama, Hiroko ;
Yan, Xiaoyuan ;
Yagi, Kazuyuki .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2010, 16 (06) :1837-1846
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324
[3]   Meeting global temperature targets-the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage [J].
Azar, Christian ;
Johansson, Daniel J. A. ;
Mattsson, Niclas .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03)
[4]   Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions [J].
Beach, Robert H. ;
DeAngelo, Benjamin J. ;
Rose, Steven ;
Li, Changsheng ;
Salas, William ;
DelGrosso, Stephen J. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 38 (02) :109-115
[5]   The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices [J].
Berners-Lee, M. ;
Hoolohan, C. ;
Cammack, H. ;
Hewitt, C. N. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 43 :184-190
[6]   Human alteration of the global nitrogen and phosphorus soil balances for the period 1970-2050 [J].
Bouwman, A. F. ;
Beusen, A. H. W. ;
Billen, G. .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2009, 23
[7]   Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification [J].
Burney, Jennifer A. ;
Davis, Steven J. ;
Lobell, David B. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (26) :12052-12057
[8]  
Cassman KG, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P132, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0132:ANUEAN]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
DeAngelo BJ, 2006, ENERG J, P89