A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Study of Jet Lidocaine Compared to Jet Placebo for Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Needle Insertion in the Emergency Department

被引:22
|
作者
Auerbach, Marc [1 ]
Tunik, Michael [1 ]
Mojica, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Bellevue Hosp Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Pediat,Div Pediat Emergency Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
local anesthesia; needle insertion; FREE INJECTION SYSTEM; PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANALOG SCALE; CATHETERIZATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00401.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The objectives were to determine whether pretreatment with needleless jet-delivered lidocaine decreases self-reported pain in children undergoing needle insertion in the emergency department (ED) and to explore whether pretreatment with a jet device decreases self-reported pain in children undergoing needle insertion in the ED. This study examined needle insertion pain in children 5-18 years of age. In the first phase of this study, children received either pretreatment with jet-delivered lidocaine (0.2 mL of buffered 1% lidocaine; n = 75) or pretreatment with jet-delivered placebo (0.2 mL of preservative-free normal saline; n = 75) 60 seconds before undergoing needle insertion. This phase of the study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. In the second phase, an unblinded, nonconcurrent, nonintervention control group (n = 47) was examined to describe any effect of using the jet device. Patients reported pain upon administration of the jet device and at needle insertion using a 100-mm color analog scale (CAS). Patients also reported their satisfaction with this device. The physicians and nurses performing needle insertions were asked to rate their ability to visualize the vein and their satisfaction with the device. The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) needle insertion pain score for jet lidocaine, 28 (+/- 7) mm, was similar to the mean needle insertion pain score for jet placebo, 34 (+/- 7) mm. The mean needle insertion pain score for both the jet lidocaine and the jet placebo groups were lower than the needle insertion pain scores for the no device group, 52 (+/- 8) mm. The majority of patients receiving the jet device reported that they would request this device for future needle insertions. Providers' ratings of their ability to visualize veins and the patient cooperation were similar in all three groups. Jet-delivered lidocaine is no more effective than jet-delivered placebo in providing local anesthesia for needle insertion. Jet lidocaine and jet placebo may provide superior analgesia compared to no local anesthetic pretreatment.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 393
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Topical Lidocaine Spray With Placebo for Pain Relief in Colposcopic Procedures: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
    Oz, Murat
    Korkmaz, Elmas
    Cetinkaya, Nilufer
    Bas, Sevda
    Ozdal, Bulent
    Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu
    Gungor, Tayfun
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2015, 19 (03) : 212 - 214
  • [2] Ketorolac plus Lidocaine vs Lidocaine for pain relief following core needle soft tissue biopsy A CONSORT-compliant double-blind randomized controlled study
    Chobpenthai, Thanapon
    Ingviya, Thammasin
    Thanindratarn, Pichaya
    Jaiwithee, Rattakorn
    Sutthivaiyakit, Kulwadee
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (07) : E24721
  • [3] Effectiveness of lidocaine spray on radial arterial puncture pain: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial
    Yildiz, Ismail Ufuk
    Yildirim, Cagdas
    Ozhasenekler, Ayhan
    Sener, Alp
    Gokhan, Servan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 : 724 - 728
  • [4] Does Nebulized Lidocaine Reduce the Pain and Distress of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Young Children? A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Babl, Franz E.
    Goldfinch, Christopher
    Mandrawa, Christine
    Crellin, Dianne
    O'Sullivan, Ronan
    Donath, Susan
    PEDIATRICS, 2009, 123 (06) : 1548 - 1555
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study
    Kim, Yong-Chul
    Castaneda, Anyela Marcela
    Lee, Chang-soon
    Jin, Hyun-Seung
    Park, Keun Seok
    Moon, Jee Youn
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (04) : 415 - 424
  • [6] The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study
    Senturk, Mehmet Baki
    Guraslan, Hakan
    Babaoglu, Bulent
    Yasar, Levent
    Polat, Mesut
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2016, 81 (03) : 280 - 284
  • [7] Safety and Efficacy of Needle-free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System in Adult Patients Undergoing Venipuncture or Peripheral Venous Cannulation A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Zempsky, William T.
    Schmitz, Michael L.
    Meyer, James M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 32 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [8] Randomized Double-blind Placebo Controlled Crossover Study of Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen/Hydrocodone, and Placebo for the Relief of Pain From a Standard Painful Stimulus
    Miner, James R.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (09) : 911 - 914
  • [9] Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine for Effective Pain Relief after Laparoscopic Appendectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, placebo-controlled Study
    Kang, H.
    Kim, B-G
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (03) : 821 - 832
  • [10] The Efficacy of Oral Midazolam for Decreasing Anxiety in Children Undergoing Voiding Cystourethrogram: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study
    Ferguson, Genoa G.
    Chen, Cathy
    Yan, Yan
    Royer, Michele E.
    Campigotto, Mary
    Traxel, Erica J.
    Coplen, Douglas E.
    Austin, Paul F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (06) : 2542 - 2546