A Comparison of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD)

被引:10
|
作者
Natavio, Teofanes [1 ]
McQuillen, Elizabeth [1 ]
Dietrich, Mary S. [2 ]
Wells, Nancy [2 ]
Rhoten, Bethany A. [2 ]
Vallerand, April Hazard [1 ]
Monroe, Todd B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Coll Nursing, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; SELF-REPORTED PAIN; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; OLDER-ADULTS; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; INTENSITY; PEOPLE; VALIDATION; BEHAVIOR; MODERATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2020.04.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: There is currently no gold standard instrument for assessing pain in severely cognitively impaired adults who are unable to provide self-report. Aims: To determine interrater reliability of the PACSLAC and PAINAD in assessing pain behaviors in patients with the same pain stimulus, determine the consistency of the reliable changes between and within the instruments and assess nurse preference for either instrument. Design: A single-group, within-subjects repeated-measures design was implemented. Setting: The study took place in a small suburban hospital. Participants/Subjects: Pain levels were observed at 24, 48, and 72 hours postsurgery using two instruments: Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD). These instruments were selected because they are among the most commonly recommended tools for clinical use. Interrater reliability was analyzed along with reliable changes in pain for each period, and the study concluded with the nurse raters completing a preference survey. Methods: A convenience sample of 30 patients was used with a diagnosis of severe dementia rendering the patient unable to reliably express pain, 60thorn years of age, recovering from hip fracture surgery. Results: Greater interrater reliability was found for the PACSLAC, with reliable change potentially affected by the type and level of pain medication. The nurses' preference for the tool was split. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the PACSLAC may be the more reliable tool over the PAINAD; however, rater training and familiarity with the tool is critical. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Pain Management Nursing. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 509
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Is Pain Assessment of Community-Dwelling Persons With Advanced Dementia by Family and Paid Care Workers Feasible?
    Bentur, Netta
    Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska
    Radomyslsky, Zorian
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 61 (05) : 1028 - 1034
  • [32] Exploring healthcare assistants' role and experience in pain assessment and management for people with advanced dementia towards the end of life: a qualitative study
    Jansen, Bannin De Witt
    Brazil, Kevin
    Passmore, Peter
    Buchanan, Hilary
    Maxwell, Doreen
    McIlfatrick, Sonja J.
    Morgan, Sharon M.
    Watson, Max
    Parsons, Carole
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2017, 16
  • [33] Development and psychometric assessment of barriers to postoperative pain management in dementia scale: A mixed methods exploratory study
    Didvar, Farzaneh
    Ghaffari, Fatemeh
    Shamsalinia, Abbas
    NURSING AND MIDWIFERY STUDIES, 2022, 11 (04) : 253 - 260
  • [34] Effectiveness of the Japanese DOLOPLUS-2: a pain assessment scale for patients with moderate-to-severe dementia
    Ando, Chiaki
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Amemiya, Shimon
    Tamura, Kyoko
    Kako, Ken
    Tsuzura, Satoko
    Yoshida, Ryoichi
    Hishinuma, Michiko
    PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2016, 16 (05) : 315 - 322
  • [35] Comparison of the Zurich Observation Pain Assessment with the Behavioural Pain Scale and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool in nonverbal patients in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study
    Froehlich, Martin R.
    Meyer, Gabriele
    Spirig, Rebecca
    Bachmann, Lucas M.
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2020, 60