A Comparison of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD)

被引:10
|
作者
Natavio, Teofanes [1 ]
McQuillen, Elizabeth [1 ]
Dietrich, Mary S. [2 ]
Wells, Nancy [2 ]
Rhoten, Bethany A. [2 ]
Vallerand, April Hazard [1 ]
Monroe, Todd B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Coll Nursing, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; SELF-REPORTED PAIN; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; OLDER-ADULTS; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; INTENSITY; PEOPLE; VALIDATION; BEHAVIOR; MODERATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2020.04.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: There is currently no gold standard instrument for assessing pain in severely cognitively impaired adults who are unable to provide self-report. Aims: To determine interrater reliability of the PACSLAC and PAINAD in assessing pain behaviors in patients with the same pain stimulus, determine the consistency of the reliable changes between and within the instruments and assess nurse preference for either instrument. Design: A single-group, within-subjects repeated-measures design was implemented. Setting: The study took place in a small suburban hospital. Participants/Subjects: Pain levels were observed at 24, 48, and 72 hours postsurgery using two instruments: Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD). These instruments were selected because they are among the most commonly recommended tools for clinical use. Interrater reliability was analyzed along with reliable changes in pain for each period, and the study concluded with the nurse raters completing a preference survey. Methods: A convenience sample of 30 patients was used with a diagnosis of severe dementia rendering the patient unable to reliably express pain, 60thorn years of age, recovering from hip fracture surgery. Results: Greater interrater reliability was found for the PACSLAC, with reliable change potentially affected by the type and level of pain medication. The nurses' preference for the tool was split. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the PACSLAC may be the more reliable tool over the PAINAD; however, rater training and familiarity with the tool is critical. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Pain Management Nursing. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 509
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] A novel pain assessment tool incorporating automated facial analysis: interrater reliability in advanced dementia
    Atee, Mustafa
    Hoti, Kreshnik
    Parsons, Richard
    Hughes, Jeffery D.
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2018, 13 : 1245 - 1258
  • [22] Validity of the Korean Version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale for Assessment of Pain in Dementia Patients
    Moon, Yeonsil
    Kim, Yoon-Sook
    Lee, Jongmin
    Han, Seol-Heui
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 32 (11) : 1852 - 1856
  • [23] Instruments for pain assessment in patients with advanced dementia: A systematic review of the evidence for Latin America
    Coca, Silvia Mercedes
    Abeldano Zuniga, Roberto Ariel
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2020, 18 (06) : 741 - 747
  • [24] Doloplus-2 pain assessment: an effective tool in patients over 85 years with advanced dementia and persistent pain
    Monacelli, F.
    Nurse, A. Vasile
    Odetti, P.
    Traverso, N.
    CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2013, 164 (01): : E23 - E25
  • [25] Pain Assessment for Individuals with Advanced Dementia in Care Homes: A Systematic Review
    Felton, Nansi
    Lewis, Jennifer S.
    Cockburn, Sarah-Jane
    Hodgson, Margot
    Dawson, Shoba
    GERIATRICS, 2021, 6 (04)
  • [26] Algoplus® Scale in Older Patients with Dementia: A Reliable Real-World Pain Assessment Tool
    Monacelli, Fiammetta
    Signori, Alessio
    Roffredo, Laura
    Pace, Katiuscia
    Nencioni, Alessio
    Pickering, Gisele
    Nicolas, Macian
    Odetti, Patrizio
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2017, 56 (02) : 519 - 527
  • [27] A Comparison of Pain Assessment Measures in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Rating Scale
    Myrvik, Matthew P.
    Drendel, Amy L.
    Brandow, Amanda M.
    Yan, Ke
    Hoffmann, Raymond G.
    Panepinto, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2015, 37 (03) : 190 - 194
  • [28] Comparison of a Pain Tolerability Question With the Numeric Rating Scale for Assessment of Self-reported Chronic Pain
    Markman, John D.
    Gewandter, Jennifer S.
    Frazer, Maria E.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (04) : E203155
  • [29] Comparison of the PainMatcher and the Visual Analogue Scale for assessment of labour pain following administered pain relief treatment
    Bergh, Ingrid H. E.
    Stener-Victorin, Elisabet
    Wallin, Gunnar
    Martensson, Lena
    MIDWIFERY, 2011, 27 (01) : E134 - E139
  • [30] Mobilization-observation-behavior-intensity-dementia pain scale (MOBID): Development and validation of a nurse administered pain assessment tool for use in dementia
    Husebo, Bettina Sandgathe
    Strand, Liv Inger
    Moe-Nilssen, Rolf
    Husebo, Stein Borge
    Snow, Andrea Lynn
    Ljunggren, Anne Elisabeth
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 34 (01) : 67 - 80