Suppression of Annual Weeds in Pea and Cereal Intercrops

被引:11
作者
Arlauskiene, Ausra [1 ]
Sarunaite, Lina [2 ]
Kadziuliene, Zydre [2 ]
Deveikyte, Irena [2 ]
Maiksteniene, Stanislava [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Res Ctr Agr & Forestry, Joniskelis Expt Stn, LT-39301 Joniskelis, Pasvalys Distr, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian Res Ctr Agr & Forestry, Inst Agr, LT-58344 Akademija, Kedainiai Distr, Lithuania
关键词
DENSITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; ROTATION;
D O I
10.2134/agronj13.0478
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Experiments were constructed to investigate e effects of pea [Pisum sativum L. (Partim)] and spring cereal intercrops on annual weed suppression and grain yield in an organic farming system. Pea, spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori et Paol.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), and triticale (x Triticosecale Wittm.) were sown as sole crops and as intercrops at a 50: 50 proportion of grain legume and spring cereal seeds relative to sole crop rates. The density of wheat, oat, and triticale sole crops was significantly higher compared with intercrops with pea. All investigated intercrops were significantly denser than the sole pea crop. Low height was observed in pea and barley sole crops and intercrops. Mostly weed number and mass were not significantly different between sole cereal and intercrops. Crop density was more effected by suppression than weed height. Where crops were sparser, increases in weed density and mass corresponded to a significant decline in grain yield. In the peacereal intercrop, where pea accounted for 20.3 to 35.2% of the total plant number, cereals exhibited the greatest weed suppression ability, productive stem number and height being the main factors responsible for this.
引用
收藏
页码:1765 / 1774
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Exploring sustainable farming scenarios at a regional scale: an application to dairy farms in Brittany
    Acosta-Alba, Ivonne
    Lopez-Ridaura, Santiago
    van der Werf, Hayo M. G.
    Leterme, Philippe
    Corson, Michael S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 28 : 160 - 167
  • [2] Competitive dynamics in two- and three-component intercrops
    Andersen, Mette Klindt
    Hauggaard-Nielsen, Henrik
    Weiner, Jacob
    Jensen, Erik Steen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2007, 44 (03) : 545 - 551
  • [3] A rotation design to reduce weed density in organic farming
    Anderson, Randy L.
    [J]. RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (03) : 189 - 195
  • [4] A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations
    Anderson, RL
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2005, 97 (06) : 1579 - 1583
  • [5] Anil L, 1998, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V53, P301, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.00144.x
  • [6] Arlauskiene A, 2011, ZEMDIRBYSTE, V98, P339
  • [7] Auskalniene O, 2008, ZEMDIRBYSTE, V95, P5
  • [8] Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues?
    Bàrberi, P
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2002, 42 (03) : 177 - 193
  • [9] Weed-suppressive effects of maize-legume intercropping in organic farming
    Bilalis, Dimitrios
    Papastylianou, Panayiota
    Konstantas, Aristidis
    Patsiali, Sotiria
    Karkanis, Anestis
    Efthimiadou, Aspasia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2010, 56 (02) : 173 - 181
  • [10] Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems
    Bond, W
    Grundy, AC
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (05) : 383 - 405