The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations

被引:13
作者
Urakawa, Hikari [1 ]
Jones, Tuckerman [1 ]
Samuel, Andre [1 ]
Vaishnav, Avani S. [1 ]
Othman, Yahya [1 ]
Virk, Sohrab [1 ]
Katsuura, Yoshihiro [1 ,2 ]
Iyer, Sravisht [1 ,2 ]
McAnany, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Albert, Todd [1 ,2 ]
Gang, Catherine Himo [1 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
关键词
Database; Decompression; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Fusion; Isthmic spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Revision; Risk factors; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; PLUS FUSION; SURGERY; TRENDS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.026
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND/CONTEXT: Although decompression without fusion is a reasonable surgical treatment option for some patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) secondary to spondylolisthesis, some of these patients will require secondary surgery for subsequent fusion. Long-term outcome and need for subsequent fusion in patients treated with decompression alone in the setting of lumbar spondylolisthesis remains controversial. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the rate, timing, and risk factors of subsequent fusion for patients after decompression alone for LSS with spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who had LSS with spondylolisthesis and underwent decompression alone at 1 or 2 levels as a primary lumbar surgery with more than 5 year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate, timing, and risk factors for subsequent fusion. METHODS: Subjects were extracted from both public and private insurance resources in a nationwide insurer database. Risk factors for subsequent fusion were evaluated by multivariate cox proportion-hazard regression controlling for age, gender, comorbidities and the presence or absence of claudication. RESULTS: Five thousand eight hundred and seventy-five patients in the public insurance population (PI population) and 1,456 patients in the private insurance population (PrI population) were included in this study. The rates of patients who needed subsequent fusion were 1.9% at 1 year, 3.5% at 2 years, and 6.7% at 5 years in the PI population, whereas they were 4.3% at 1 year, 8.9% at 2 years, 14.6% at 5 years in the PrI population. The time to subsequent fusion was 730 (365-1234) days in the PI population and 588 (300-998) days in the PrI population. Age less than 70 years, presence of neurogenic claudication and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)/collagen vascular diseases (CVD) were independent risk factors for subsequent fusion in both populations. CONCLUSIONS: Decompression surgery alone can demonstrate good outcomes in some patients with LSS with spondylolisthesis. It is important for surgeons to recognize, however, that patient age less than 70 years, symptomatic neurogenic claudication, and presence of RA and/or CVD are significant independent factors associated with greater likelihood of needing secondary fusion surgery. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1566 / 1572
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical and radiological outcomes of lumbar endoscopic decompression for treating lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a retrospective study at mean 4.4 years follow-up
    Fan, Ning
    Wang, Aobo
    Yuan, Shuo
    Du, Peng
    Wang, Tianyi
    Zang, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 11
  • [32] Recompression after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: risk factors and outcomes of two different reoperation procedures
    Yuan, Shuo
    Wang, Aobo
    Fan, Ning
    Du, Peng
    Wang, Tianyi
    Li, Jian
    Zhu, Wenyi
    Zang, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [33] Adjacent Level Canal Area Changes up to Two Years After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompressive Surgery
    Brisby, Helena
    Myklebust, Tor age
    Banitalebi, Hasan
    Austevoll, Ivar
    Aaen, Jorn
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Hellum, Christian
    Franssen, Eric
    Indrekvam, Kari
    Hermansen, Erland
    SPINE, 2025, 50 (07) : 429 - 436
  • [34] Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial
    Kgomotso, Eric Loratang
    Hellum, Christian
    Fagerland, Morten Wang
    Solberg, Tore
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Hermansen, Erland
    Franssen, Eric
    Weber, Clemens
    Brisby, Helena
    Algaard, Knut Robert Hector
    Furunes, Havard
    Banitalebi, Hasan
    Ljostad, Inger
    Indrekvam, Kari
    Austevoll, Ivar Magne
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 386
  • [35] Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up
    Salimi, Hamidullah
    Toyoda, Hiromitsu
    Terai, Hidetomi
    Yamada, Kentaro
    Hoshino, Masatoshi
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Takahashi, Shinji
    Tamai, Koji
    Hori, Yusuke
    Yabu, Akito
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (05) : 819 - 826
  • [36] Evaluation of Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization Compared with Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 5-year Follow-up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Musacchio, Michael J.
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Davis, Reginald J.
    Bae, Hyun W.
    Peloza, John H.
    Guyer, Richard D.
    Zigler, Jack E.
    Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
    Leary, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 10
  • [37] Long-term Radiological and Clinical Outcome after Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective 6-Year Follow-up Study
    Bredow, Jan
    Meyer, Carolin
    Oikonomidis, Stavros
    Kernich, Constantin
    Kernich, Nikolaus
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    Heck, Vincent J.
    Eysel, Peer
    Prasse, Tobias
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (08) : 1607 - 1614
  • [38] Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction After Decompression Surgery Without Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Ogura, Yoji
    Kobayashi, Yoshiomi
    Shinozaki, Yoshio
    Kitagawa, Takahiro
    Yonezawa, Yoshiro
    Takahashi, Yoshiyuki
    Yoshida, Kodai
    Yasuda, Akimasa
    Ogawa, Jun
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (05) : 627 - 632
  • [39] Microdecompressive Laminatomy With a 5-year Follow-up Period for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Celik, Suat Erol
    Celik, Sevinc
    Goksu, Kamber
    Kara, Ayhan
    Ince, Irfan
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2010, 23 (04): : 229 - 235
  • [40] The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
    Ivar M. Austevoll
    Rolf Gjestad
    Jens Ivar Brox
    Tore K. Solberg
    Kjersti Storheim
    Frode Rekeland
    Erland Hermansen
    Kari Indrekvam
    Christian Hellum
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 404 - 413