The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations

被引:13
作者
Urakawa, Hikari [1 ]
Jones, Tuckerman [1 ]
Samuel, Andre [1 ]
Vaishnav, Avani S. [1 ]
Othman, Yahya [1 ]
Virk, Sohrab [1 ]
Katsuura, Yoshihiro [1 ,2 ]
Iyer, Sravisht [1 ,2 ]
McAnany, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Albert, Todd [1 ,2 ]
Gang, Catherine Himo [1 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
关键词
Database; Decompression; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Fusion; Isthmic spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Revision; Risk factors; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; PLUS FUSION; SURGERY; TRENDS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.026
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND/CONTEXT: Although decompression without fusion is a reasonable surgical treatment option for some patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) secondary to spondylolisthesis, some of these patients will require secondary surgery for subsequent fusion. Long-term outcome and need for subsequent fusion in patients treated with decompression alone in the setting of lumbar spondylolisthesis remains controversial. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the rate, timing, and risk factors of subsequent fusion for patients after decompression alone for LSS with spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who had LSS with spondylolisthesis and underwent decompression alone at 1 or 2 levels as a primary lumbar surgery with more than 5 year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate, timing, and risk factors for subsequent fusion. METHODS: Subjects were extracted from both public and private insurance resources in a nationwide insurer database. Risk factors for subsequent fusion were evaluated by multivariate cox proportion-hazard regression controlling for age, gender, comorbidities and the presence or absence of claudication. RESULTS: Five thousand eight hundred and seventy-five patients in the public insurance population (PI population) and 1,456 patients in the private insurance population (PrI population) were included in this study. The rates of patients who needed subsequent fusion were 1.9% at 1 year, 3.5% at 2 years, and 6.7% at 5 years in the PI population, whereas they were 4.3% at 1 year, 8.9% at 2 years, 14.6% at 5 years in the PrI population. The time to subsequent fusion was 730 (365-1234) days in the PI population and 588 (300-998) days in the PrI population. Age less than 70 years, presence of neurogenic claudication and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)/collagen vascular diseases (CVD) were independent risk factors for subsequent fusion in both populations. CONCLUSIONS: Decompression surgery alone can demonstrate good outcomes in some patients with LSS with spondylolisthesis. It is important for surgeons to recognize, however, that patient age less than 70 years, symptomatic neurogenic claudication, and presence of RA and/or CVD are significant independent factors associated with greater likelihood of needing secondary fusion surgery. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1566 / 1572
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up
    Karlsson, T.
    Forsth, P.
    Skorpil, M.
    Pazarlis, K.
    Ohagen, P.
    Michaelsson, K.
    Sanden, B.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2022, 104B (12) : 1343 - 1351
  • [2] Results of Decompression Alone in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
    Ha, Dae-Ho
    Kim, Tae-Kyun
    Oh, Sung-Kyun
    Cho, Hyung-Gyu
    Kim, Keon-Rok
    Shim, Dae-Moo
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 187 - 193
  • [3] Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Fusion or Decompression Alone Results in Similar Rates of Reoperation at 5 Years
    Vorhies, John S.
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Alamin, Todd
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01): : E74 - E79
  • [4] Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Microendoscopic Muscle-preserving Interlaminar Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With >5-Year Follow-up
    Kimura, Ryota
    Yoshimoto, Mitsunori
    Miyakoshi, Naohisa
    Hongo, Michio
    Kasukawa, Yuji
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Kikuchi, Kazuma
    Okuyama, Koichiro
    Kido, Tadato
    Hirota, Ryosuke
    Hamada, Shuto
    Chiba, Mitsuho
    Abe, Eiji
    Yamashita, Toshihiko
    Shimoda, Yoichi
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08): : E380 - E385
  • [5] Decompression alone or fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis? A systematic review and meta analysis
    Cheng, Haiyang
    Luo, Gan
    Xu, Dan
    Li, Yuqiao
    Yang, Houzhi
    Cao, Sheng
    Sun, Tianwei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [6] Seven years follow-up for total lumbar facet joint replacement (TOPS) in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Anekstein, Yoram
    Floman, Yizhar
    Smorgick, Yossi
    Rand, Nahshon
    Millgram, Michael
    Mirovsky, Yigal
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (10) : 2306 - 2314
  • [7] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Treated with Decompression Alone. A Cohort of 346 Patients at a Large Spine Unit. Clinical Outcome, Complications and Subsequent Surgery
    Pazarlis, Konstantinos
    Frost, Anders
    Forsth, Peter
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (06) : 470 - 475
  • [8] Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study
    Minamide, Akihito
    Yoshida, Munehito
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    Nakagawa, Yukihiro
    Hashizume, Hiroshi
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Tsutsui, Shunji
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (02) : 396 - 403
  • [9] Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Adjacent Segment Disease following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: 5-year Follow-up of a Retrospective Case Series
    Murata, Shizumasa
    Minamide, Akihito
    Nakagawa, Yukihiro
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Taneichi, Hiroshi
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Simpson, Andrew K.
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 83 (05) : 403 - 410
  • [10] Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression versus Open Decompression and Fusion Surgery for the Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study
    Song, Qingpeng
    Zhu, Bin
    Zhao, Wenkui
    Liang, Chen
    Hai, Bao
    Liu, Xiaoguang
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 1331 - 1338