Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

被引:36
|
作者
Attard, C. L. [1 ]
Brown, S. [1 ]
Alloul, K. [2 ]
Moore, M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cornerstone Res Grp Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Sanofi Canada, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词
FOLFIRINOX; gemcitabine; cost-effectiveness; pancreatic cancer; ACCORD trial; chemotherapy; quality-adjusted life year; QALY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEMCITABINE; METAANALYSIS; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.3747/co.21.1327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The accord 11/0402 trial demonstrated that FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is significantly more efficacious than gemcitabine monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of first-line FOLFIRINOX compared with first-line gemcitabine for public payers in Canada. Methods A Markov model simulated the movement of MPC patients from first-line treatment until death. Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were derived from accord. Published utility data and Canadian costs were applied based on time in each health state and on treatment-related adverse event (AE) rates. Costs included first-and second-line therapy, monitoring, and costs to treat AES. Two separate analyses were performed. Analysis 1 was based on trial data [first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allowed], and analysis 2 used Ontario treatment patterns before FOLFIRINOX funding (first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by best supportive care, no use of G-CSF). Results Compared with first-line gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX resulted in more life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYS). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results showed that, for analyses 1 and 2 respectively, FOLFIRINOX has a greater than 85% probability and an approximately 80% probability of being cost-effective at the $100,000 threshold. Conclusions Compared with gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX significantly prolongs median os. Given the favourable cost per QALY, the improvement in clinical efficacy, and the limited available treatment options, FOLFIRINOX represents an attractive cost-effective treatment for MPC.
引用
收藏
页码:E41 / E51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies in the First-line Treatment of RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Morimoto, Takashi
    Fujito, Kaori
    Yamasaki, Bumpei
    Goto, Rei
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 45 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [42] First-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX for metastatic pancreatic cancer in a real-world population
    Hatashima, Alycia
    Arango, Matthew J.
    Reardon, Joshua
    Freeman, Tracelyn
    Williams, Terence
    McLaughlin, Eric M.
    Abushahin, Laith
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (20) : 2521 - 2532
  • [43] Updates on First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Strimpakos, Alexios S.
    Syrigos, Kostas N.
    Saif, Muhammad Wasif
    JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS, 2011, 12 (04): : 339 - 342
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab and trastuzumab as a first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China
    Wang, Hao
    Wang, Ye
    Gong, Ruixue
    Geng, Yuyu
    Li, Li
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (11) : 11382 - 11393
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus folfirinox in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in china
    Cui, Jiujie
    Zhang, Xiaochen
    Qu, Shuli
    Wang, Liwei
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 691 - 697
  • [46] Cost-Effectiveness of Pemetrexed as First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Klein, Robert
    Wielage, Ron
    Muehlenbein, Catherine
    Liepa, Astra M.
    Babineaux, Steve
    Lawson, Anthony
    Schwartzberg, Lee
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5 (08) : 1263 - 1272
  • [47] Comparative effectiveness and resource utilization of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine for the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a US community setting
    Braiteh, Fadi
    Patel, Manish B.
    Parisi, Monika
    Ni, Quanhong
    Park, Siyeon
    Faria, Claudio
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2017, 9 : 141 - 148
  • [48] First-Line Tislelizumab for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma:A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Chen, Hongcai
    Cai, Hongfu
    Zhu, Huide
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (03) : 397 - 404
  • [49] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Versus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma After First-Line Treatment in China
    Tang, Wen-Xi
    Shao, Rong-Jie
    Wang, Jingshu
    Scherrer, Emilie
    Ma, Ai-Xia
    Aguiar-Ibanez, Raquel
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 27 : 99 - 107
  • [50] Danish experiences with FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer
    Kraemer, Pia Charlotte
    Schmidt, Hjordis Hjalting
    Ladekarl, Morten
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 61 (04):