Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

被引:36
|
作者
Attard, C. L. [1 ]
Brown, S. [1 ]
Alloul, K. [2 ]
Moore, M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cornerstone Res Grp Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Sanofi Canada, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词
FOLFIRINOX; gemcitabine; cost-effectiveness; pancreatic cancer; ACCORD trial; chemotherapy; quality-adjusted life year; QALY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEMCITABINE; METAANALYSIS; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.3747/co.21.1327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The accord 11/0402 trial demonstrated that FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is significantly more efficacious than gemcitabine monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of first-line FOLFIRINOX compared with first-line gemcitabine for public payers in Canada. Methods A Markov model simulated the movement of MPC patients from first-line treatment until death. Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were derived from accord. Published utility data and Canadian costs were applied based on time in each health state and on treatment-related adverse event (AE) rates. Costs included first-and second-line therapy, monitoring, and costs to treat AES. Two separate analyses were performed. Analysis 1 was based on trial data [first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allowed], and analysis 2 used Ontario treatment patterns before FOLFIRINOX funding (first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by best supportive care, no use of G-CSF). Results Compared with first-line gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX resulted in more life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYS). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results showed that, for analyses 1 and 2 respectively, FOLFIRINOX has a greater than 85% probability and an approximately 80% probability of being cost-effective at the $100,000 threshold. Conclusions Compared with gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX significantly prolongs median os. Given the favourable cost per QALY, the improvement in clinical efficacy, and the limited available treatment options, FOLFIRINOX represents an attractive cost-effective treatment for MPC.
引用
收藏
页码:E41 / E51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Qin, Shuxia
    Yi, Lidan
    Li, Sini
    Tan, Chongqing
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Wang, Liting
    Peng, Ye
    Wan, Xiaomin
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (06) : 3399 - 3408
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China
    Zhao, Ziying
    Chen, Tongfeng
    Zhou, Zhen
    Guo, Rui
    Liu, Qiao
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC
    Chen, Ping
    Li, Yinfeng
    Jing, Xiaomei
    Chen, Jing
    Chen, Shimei
    Yang, Qing
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 174 : 157 - 164
  • [34] Sequential first-line treatment with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: GABRINOX phase Ib-II controlled clinical trial
    Assenat, E.
    de la Fouchardiere, C.
    Portales, F.
    Ychou, M.
    Debourdeau, A.
    Desseigne, F.
    Iltache, S.
    Fiess, C.
    Mollevi, C.
    Mazard, T.
    ESMO OPEN, 2021, 6 (06)
  • [35] Meta-analysis of FOLFIRINOX regimen as the first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Xu, Xifeng
    Wu, Qiong
    Wang, Zhen
    Zheng, Song
    Ge, Ke
    Jia, Changku
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [36] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer in the United States
    Monk, Bradley J.
    van Mens, Sophie
    Hale, Oliver
    Boer, Jennifer
    van Hees, Frank
    Swami, Shilpi
    Muston, Dominic
    Tekin, Cumhur
    Keefe, Steve
    Monberg, Matthew
    ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2025, 13 (01) : 85 - 98
  • [37] Dacomitinib in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Aguilar-Serra, Javier
    Gimeno-Ballester, Vicente
    Pastor-Clerigues, Alfonso
    Milara, Javier
    Marti-Bonmati, Ezequiel
    Trigo-Vicente, Cristina
    Cortijo, Julio
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (04) : 325 - 335
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of olanzapine in the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China
    Zhao, Jingping
    Jiang, Kaida
    Li, Qingwei
    Zhang, Yanlei
    Cheng, Yan
    Lin, Ziyi
    Xuan, Jianwei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (05) : 439 - 446
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer
    Pei, Zhengda
    Xiao, Ningping
    Yang, Pei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer in the United States
    Aguiar-Ibanez, Raquel
    Hardern, Chloe
    van Hees, Frank
    Lee, Dawn
    Patel, Anubhav
    Chhabra, Nitika
    Baluni, Gargi
    Amonkar, Mayur
    Lai, Yizhen
    Xu, Ruifeng
    Massaad, Rachid
    Fogelman, David
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 469 - 480