Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

被引:36
|
作者
Attard, C. L. [1 ]
Brown, S. [1 ]
Alloul, K. [2 ]
Moore, M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cornerstone Res Grp Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Sanofi Canada, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词
FOLFIRINOX; gemcitabine; cost-effectiveness; pancreatic cancer; ACCORD trial; chemotherapy; quality-adjusted life year; QALY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEMCITABINE; METAANALYSIS; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.3747/co.21.1327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The accord 11/0402 trial demonstrated that FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is significantly more efficacious than gemcitabine monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of first-line FOLFIRINOX compared with first-line gemcitabine for public payers in Canada. Methods A Markov model simulated the movement of MPC patients from first-line treatment until death. Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were derived from accord. Published utility data and Canadian costs were applied based on time in each health state and on treatment-related adverse event (AE) rates. Costs included first-and second-line therapy, monitoring, and costs to treat AES. Two separate analyses were performed. Analysis 1 was based on trial data [first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allowed], and analysis 2 used Ontario treatment patterns before FOLFIRINOX funding (first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by best supportive care, no use of G-CSF). Results Compared with first-line gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX resulted in more life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYS). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results showed that, for analyses 1 and 2 respectively, FOLFIRINOX has a greater than 85% probability and an approximately 80% probability of being cost-effective at the $100,000 threshold. Conclusions Compared with gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX significantly prolongs median os. Given the favourable cost per QALY, the improvement in clinical efficacy, and the limited available treatment options, FOLFIRINOX represents an attractive cost-effective treatment for MPC.
引用
收藏
页码:E41 / E51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Li, Huan
    Li, Qian
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [22] Comparison of efficacy and safety between standard-dose and modified-dose FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment of pancreatic cancer
    Kang, Huapyong
    Jo, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Bang, Seungmin
    Park, Seung Woo
    Song, Si Young
    Park, Jeong Youp
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 10 (11) : 421 - 430
  • [23] Adding Enzalutamide to First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Zhang, Peng-Fei
    Xie, Dan
    Li, Qiu
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data
    Shinohara, Akira
    Takumoto, Yuki
    Tauchi, Junko
    Morishita, Koki
    Kawasaki, Toshikatsu
    Akazawa, Manabu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Chen, Xudong
    Liang, Weiting
    Wan, Ning
    Zhang, Li
    Yang, Yunpeng
    Jiang, Jie
    Zhang, Tiantian
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 94 : 80 - 85
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer based on PRODIGE and MPACT trials
    Zhou, Jing
    Zhao, Rongce
    Wen, Feng
    Zhang, Pengfei
    Wu, Yifan
    Tang, Ruilei
    Chen, Hongdou
    Zhang, Jian
    Li, Qiu
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2016, 102 (03): : 294 - 300
  • [27] Metastatic pancreatic cancer with complete response to FOLFIRINOX treatment
    Shelemey, Paige T.
    Amaro, Carla P.
    Ng, Danny
    Falck, Vincent
    Tam, Vincent C.
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2021, 14 (05)
  • [28] Phase II Trial of Erlotinib plus Capecitabine as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (XELTA Study)
    Lopez, Rafael
    Mendez Mendez, Carlos
    Jorge Fernandez, Monica
    Romero Reinoso, Carlos
    Quintero Aldana, Guillermo
    Salgado Fernandez, Mercedes
    De La Camara Gomez, Juan
    Reboredo Lopez, Margarita
    Ramos Vazquez, Manuel
    Candamio Folgar, Sonia
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (02) : 717 - 723
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China
    Tang, Yu-kai
    Xu, Zhe
    Ye, Zhuo-miao
    Li, Shi-ran
    Zhou, Qin
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024, 46 (01): : 5 - 14
  • [30] Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Shuxia Qin
    Lidan Yi
    Sini Li
    Chongqing Tan
    Xiaohui Zeng
    Liting Wang
    Ye Peng
    Xiaomin Wan
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 3399 - 3408